2011
DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.22.3.520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological Framework Analysing a Social phenomenon: Stakeholder Orientation Implementing Balanced Corporate Social Responsibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If the social problem solutions were part of the profit orientation of a company, it would be a more sophisticated form of capitalism (Fea, 2011). This is agreed also by Valackiene and Miceviciene (Valackiene & Miceviciene, 2011).…”
Section: Corporate Shared Values -Pros and Conssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…If the social problem solutions were part of the profit orientation of a company, it would be a more sophisticated form of capitalism (Fea, 2011). This is agreed also by Valackiene and Miceviciene (Valackiene & Miceviciene, 2011).…”
Section: Corporate Shared Values -Pros and Conssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It represents a commitment to improve the community's well-being through discretionary business practices and contribution of the companies' resources (Kotler & Lee, 2008). Corporate social responsibility is a broader mechanism and a new approach for enhancing accountability for the society and country by the company's top management (Gholami, 2011), consisted of four kinds of responsibilities: economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropy (Carroll, 1999;Aras & Aybars, 2010;Valackiene & Miceviciene, 2011). These authors suggested different variables to reveal the value in each part of CSR.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also stressed that sustainable development gave birth to CSR pursuit. , Valackienė and Micevičienė (2011) wrote that later on a four-part conceptualization of CSR included the idea that the corporation has not only economic, but also legal obligations as well as ethical and discretionary (philanthropic) responsibilities. The authors basing on Carroll (1991) tend to add legal pillar of CSR is to be conducted through performance in a manner consistent with expectations of government and law, successful fulfilment of enterprises legal obligation, provision of goods and services that at least meet minimal legal re-quirements.…”
Section: Initiatives and Prerequisites Of Socially Responsible Businementioning
confidence: 99%