Methodological Implications of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Models for Whole Systems of Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

This paper focuses on the worldview hypotheses and research design approaches from nonlinear dynamical complex systems (NDS) science that can inform future studies of whole systems of complementary and alternative medicine (WS-CAM), e.g., Ayurveda, traditional Chinese medicine, and homeopathy. The worldview hypotheses that underlie NDS and WS-CAM (contextual, organismic, interactive-integrative – Pepper, 1942) overlap with each other, but differ fundamentally from those of biomedicine (formistic, mechanistic). Differing views on the nature of causality itself lead to different types of study designs. Biomedical efficacy studies assume a simple direct mechanistic cause-effect relationship between a specific intervention and a specific bodily outcome, an assumption less relevant to WS-CAM outcomes. WS-CAM practitioners do not necessarily treat a symptom directly. Rather, they intervene to modulate an intrinsic central imbalance of the person as a system and to create a more favorable environmental context for the emergence of health, e.g., with dietary changes compatible with the constitutional type. The rebalancing of the system thereby fosters the emergence of indirect, diffuse, complex effects throughout the person and the person’s interactions with his/her environment. NDS theory-driven study designs thus have the potential for greater external and model validity than biomedically driven efficacy studies (e.g., clinical trials) for evaluating the indirect effects of WS-CAM practices. Potential applications of NDS analytic techniques to WS-CAM include characterizing different constitutional types and documenting the evolution and dynamics of whole-person healing and well-being over time. Furthermore, NDS provides models and methods for examining interactions across organizational scales, from genomic/proteomic/metabolomic networks to individuals and social groups.

One bad apple: experimental effects of psychological conflict on social resilience

“…The 'model' by default has been straight line relationships among variables which are assumed to be independent of one another, fitting Gaussian (bell-shaped) frequency distributions. By contrast, NDS models allow one to investigate complex, multi-level, systemic and interdependent processes as they unfold over time [5,6]. Such processes may involve complex and multi-directional patterns of cause and effect, deterministic variability (i.e.…”

Self-Organizing Biopsychosocial Dynamics and the Patient-Healer Relationship

“…[17]formoreon thistopic).Indeed,manyhealthandinterpersonalsituations studied using NDS models explicitly focus upon changes in An alternative explanation for such effects, however, lies simplyinthepossibilitythattheseoutcomesaretheresultofa basic problem with conceptualization and modeling, rather than a problem of treatment or data -namely the use of simple linear models to understand phenomena that are highly complex and nonlinear. Using linear models to study interpersonaldynamicsislikecuttingwoodwithahammer.It canbedone,butonlywithgreateffort;andthewoodwillbe ruinedintheprocess.Inthesameway,modelsaimedatidentifyingsimple,independent,andproportionalcausesinCAM treatments are likely to produce little more than a mess of uselessvariance.…”

Emotional inertia: A key to understanding psychotherapy process and outcome

“…In the case of psychotherapy, generally speaking, more treatment (either more sessions or more intense therapy) is typically expected to produce greater improvement. However, patients' psychosocial processes are more realistically viewed as dynamical, ever-changing and highly interactive systems that typically do not change proportionally in response to therapeutic interventions (Bell, Koithan, & Pincus, 2012;Hayes, Laurenceau, Feldman, Strauss, & Cadaciotto, 2007). NDS has shown that the behavioral dynamics of complex systems may change suddenly and unexpectedly in response to slight changes in the system's control parameters under certain conditions, while remaining robust against large changes in other circumstances.…”