2019
DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological quality of case series studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
317
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 693 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
317
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Inconsistent definitions, paired with minimal guidance, has also contributed to a lack of clarity about what to call these various reviews, and the rationale for selecting one type over another (Munn, Peters, Stern, Tufanaru, McArthur & Aromataris, 2018, p. 1). That being said, systematic literature reviews can be an effective way of "mapping out areas of uncertainty, and identifying where little or no relevant research has been done, but where new studies are needed" (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006, p. 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistent definitions, paired with minimal guidance, has also contributed to a lack of clarity about what to call these various reviews, and the rationale for selecting one type over another (Munn, Peters, Stern, Tufanaru, McArthur & Aromataris, 2018, p. 1). That being said, systematic literature reviews can be an effective way of "mapping out areas of uncertainty, and identifying where little or no relevant research has been done, but where new studies are needed" (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006, p. 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also gathered studies by searching through the reference lists of review articles identified by Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full texts, collected data and assessed risk of bias via Covidence and a hybrid critical appraisal checklist based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools for case series, analytical cross-sectional studies and prevalence studies [38][39][40] . To evaluate the sample size in a study, we used the following calculation:…”
Section: Search Strategy Selection Criteria and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for case reports, which includes 8 questions addressing the internal validity and risk of bias of case reports designs, particularly confounding and information bias, in addition to the importance of clear reporting, was used for quality assessment [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%