2023
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2192974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodologies to measure access to care post-discharge in adults with serious injury-related disability: a scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consensus S-CVI should not be less than 0.80, and the average S-CVI should reach 0.90. The evaluation criteria for K * are: 0.40 ~0.59 is average, 0.60 ~0.74 is good, and > 0.74 is excellent (16,17).…”
Section: Validity Analysis 3531 Content Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consensus S-CVI should not be less than 0.80, and the average S-CVI should reach 0.90. The evaluation criteria for K * are: 0.40 ~0.59 is average, 0.60 ~0.74 is good, and > 0.74 is excellent (16,17).…”
Section: Validity Analysis 3531 Content Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having services available in close proximity (i.e., potential access) and actually seeing the health practitioners (i.e., realised access) provide important perspectives regarding access, but are not comprehensive indicators of access [ 9 ]. A recent scoping review identified that measuring multiple dimensions of access is essential for a comprehensive understanding of healthcare access [ 10 ]. Other factors for measuring the breadth of health service access are also crucial, including the presence of unmet healthcare needs, which can directly result in poorer clinical or recovery outcomes [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%