2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-023x(02)00195-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point?

Abstract: In this paper we review and compare the main methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies that have been reported in the literature, as well as the main relationships among them. Ontology technology is nowadays mature enough: many methodologies, tools and languages are already available. The future work in this field should be driven towards the creation of a common integrated workbench for ontology developers to facilitate ontology development, exchange, evaluation, evolution and management, to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
299
0
41

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 540 publications
(340 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
299
0
41
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of methods, methodologies, tools and languages for ontology development have already been analysed by various authors (Corcho et al 2002;Mizoguchi 2003;Mizoguchi and Kozaki 2009). Languages such as OWL (Web Ontology Lanaguage) and IDEF5 (Integrated Definition for Ontology Description Capture Method) in addition to tools including Protégé and Hozo are examined to check their applicability.…”
Section: Ontology-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methods, methodologies, tools and languages for ontology development have already been analysed by various authors (Corcho et al 2002;Mizoguchi 2003;Mizoguchi and Kozaki 2009). Languages such as OWL (Web Ontology Lanaguage) and IDEF5 (Integrated Definition for Ontology Description Capture Method) in addition to tools including Protégé and Hozo are examined to check their applicability.…”
Section: Ontology-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good description of these can be found in Corcho et al, (2003) [14]. From the authors' perspective, the best definition that capture's the essence of an ontology is the one given by Gruber, (1994) [28]: "an ontology is a formal, explicit specification of a shared conceptualization".…”
Section: Philosophical Underpinnings Of Product Data and Ontology Appmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent works concern the language OWL which is a recommendation of the consortium W3C within the framework of the "semantic Web". New tools and new methods for analysis of ontologies are under development [4].…”
Section: Ontology Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%