1994
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.1994.32.11.859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology-Dependent Variations in Reticulocyte Counts Using a Manual and Two Different Flow Cytometric Procedures

Abstract: This paper describes a comparison between the microscopic brilliant cresyl blue and the flow cytometric thiazol orange (FACScan) and auramine O (Sysmex) methods for enumeration of reticulocytes.The mean intra-assay coefficients of Variation for the microscopic, FACScan and Sysmex methods were established to be 33, 9 and 5% respectively. A rather poor correlation was observed between the microscopic count and both flow cytometric methods (FACScan r = 0.61; Sysmex r = 0.57). However, the correlation between the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a later study, van Houte et al (78) found a poor correlation between the microscopic count and both flow cytometric methods (FACScan r = 0.61; Sysmex r = 0.57), but the correlation between the flow cytometric methods was satisfactory (r = 0.79). Their reference ranges for the reticulocyte count, corresponding with the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile, were as follows: microscopic (8-30/1000), FACScan (11-27/1000) and Sysmex (8-18/1000).…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a later study, van Houte et al (78) found a poor correlation between the microscopic count and both flow cytometric methods (FACScan r = 0.61; Sysmex r = 0.57), but the correlation between the flow cytometric methods was satisfactory (r = 0.79). Their reference ranges for the reticulocyte count, corresponding with the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile, were as follows: microscopic (8-30/1000), FACScan (11-27/1000) and Sysmex (8-18/1000).…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The first paper in CCLM was in 1994, when flow cytometric methods had just become available for routine use. Compared to manual reticulocyte counting, flow cytometry was found to be much more precise and enabled improved reticulocyte enumeration of abnormally low counts [39] . A recent review article confirmed the superiority of automated, flow cytometric methods, in particular methods using fluorescent dyes [40] .…”
Section: Major Categories Of Lh Papers In Chronological Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of flow cytometric methods dedicated to reticulocyte count proved a suitable alternative to light microscopy for laboratories performing high volume reticulocyte count. Flow cytometric analysis was also found to provide clinically valuable information not available by light microscopy (Hackney et al, 1989, Wallen, Higashikubo & Dethlefsen 1982, Schimenti et al, 1992van Houte et al, 1994;Laurencet, Martinez & Beris, 1997).…”
Section: S U M M a R Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1989, Wallen, Higashikubo & Dethlefsen 1982, Schimenti et al. , 1992; van Houte et al. , 1994; Laurencet, Martinez & Beris, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%