Methodology for the determination of minor and trace elements in petroleum cokes by wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WD-XRF)

Abstract

This article describes a methodology for the analysis of minor and trace elements in petroleum cokes by wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WD-XRF) spectrometry. The methodology was developed in order to have a rapid and reliable control method of these elements, because they determine coke end uses. There are a number of standard methods of chemical analysis by WD-XRF or inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) techniques. However, the standards that use WD-XRF measurement give detection limits (L D ) above 10 mg·kg −1 and only analyse a few elements of interest, whereas the ICP-OES method requires extensive sample handling and long sample preparation times, with the ensuing errors. In order to improve the method described in the standard ASTM D6376 and reach the L D and quantification limits (L Q ) required, the different stages of the process, ranging from sample preparation to measurement conditions: analytical line, detector, crystal, tube power, use of primary beam filters, and measurement time, were optimised. The samples were prepared in the form of pressed pellets, under conditions of high cleanliness of the mills, crushers, presses, and dies, and of the laboratory itself. The following reference materials were used in measurement calibration and validation: SRM 1632c, SRM 2718, SRM 2719, SRM 2685b, AR 2771, AR 2772, SARM 18, SARM 19, and CLB-1. In addition, a series of materials were analysed by WD-XRF and ICP-OES, and the results were compared. The developed methodology, which uses WD-XRF, is rapid and accurate, and very low L D and measurement uncertainties were obtained for the following elements: Al,

Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen and Sulfur in Geological Materials Using Elemental Analysers

“…The uncertainty was calculated from the expression (Gazulla et al. 2010): where u is measurement uncertainty with a 95% level of confidence, t is statistical value of Student’s t ‐test for 95% probability and ( n − 1) degrees of freedom and n is the number of measurements of the sample.…”

Development of undersized (12.5 mm diameter) low‐dilution glass beads for X‐ray fluorescence determination of 34 components in 200 mg of igneous rock for applications with geochemical and archeological silicic samples

“…Additionally, uncertainties with minor element determinations were calculated by reference to formulae discussed in detail elsewhere, in order to confirm the accuracy of the XRF technique using undersized, low‐dilution glass beads. The absolute difference between the mean measured value and recommended value was calculated by following equation: where Δ m is the absolute difference between the mean measured value and the recommended value, C m is the mean measured value, and C RM is the recommended value.…”

A new methodology for the determination of silicon in plants by wavelength dispersive X‐ray fluorescence

“…Three measurements of each material were conducted to estimate the uncertainty of the measurements, which was calculated using the expression: where u method is the combined uncertainty and k is the coverage factor, which is determined from the Student's t distribution corresponding to the appropriate degrees of freedom and 95% confidence. The u method was calculated from the expression: where is the uncertainty of the certified value of the reference material, is the uncertainty of the measurement of the reference material, and u REPRO is the uncertainty of the measurement of the sample.…”