Methodology for the early analysis and evaluation of the resource efficiency of process chains for manufacturing hybrid structures

Symmank, C.; Boll, J.; Rautenstrauch, Anja; Graf, Adam; Markov, L.; Decker, Ricardo; Schmidt, Anja; Götze, Uwe; Awiszus, Birgit; Kräusel, Verena; Landgrebe, Dirk; Kroll, Lothar

doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.053

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[8,9,10]) or ITO models (e.g. [17,20,21] have been used for this purpose. With a similar purpose but focused on costs, cost estimation techniques are useful.…”

Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[27]). Here, for example, they were used in case 3e [21]. Additionally, cost calculation schemes are necessary to determine costs as a target figure or as an input for the profit calculation or a life cycle-related NPV calculation.…”

Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the examined cases the calculation scheme of the overhead percentage calculation and the method of calculation with activity units were applied (e.g. cases 3a [17], 3d [20], and 3e [21]).…”

Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the third group of cases, hybrid technologies and process chains for manufacturing hybrid structures are focused. The cases considered include  a hybrid process chain for manufacturing (cup-shaped) hybrid metal/plastic structures (3a) [16, 17]  the use of injection molding technology for the production of thermoplastic foams (3b) [18]  design of actuators for integration into heterogeneous composite structures and actuator manufacturing technologies (3c) [19]  material alternatives for producing hybrid laminates (3d) [20] and an innovative process chain for manufacturing sensory hybrid laminates (3e) [21].…”

Section: Figure 2: Overview Of Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In these cases the evaluation is carried out from an economic target perspective and either from an ecological perspective (substantiated by analyzing the energy efficiency and robustness of the alternatives; cases 3a [17], 3e [21]) or from a technical perspective (by calculating a so-called economic lightweight index (3b [18]) or by best solution mapping (3d [20]), both including technical and economic target figures that are combined by utility value analyses, or by measuring the performance parameters of actuators (3c [19])). The methods used include a procedure model for evaluation (see e.g.…”

Section: Figure 2: Overview Of Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Life cycle engineering and management methods for designing hybrid structures – cases, potentials, and challenges

Götze

Symmank

Schmidt

2020

TLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Designing sustainable systems that take into account production factors, processes, and/or products is becoming more and more important. It is therefore the focus of research projects such as the Federal Cluster of Excellence EXC 1075 “MERGE Technologies for Multifunctional Lightweight Structures”, which strives for resource-efficient lightweight construction and especially the design of hybrid structures. To support this challenging task, the Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) approach is recommended. However, a sustainable design requires an economic or rather management orientation of the engineering activities, which is underrepresented in the LCE concept. Therefore, it is proposed to extend the LCE to a Life Cycle Engineering and Management (LCEM) concept. Since both concepts are relatively new, only a few cases of application are available. Therefore, this paper describes and analyzes cases – especially on the basis of MERGE research objects –, to which LCE and LCEM are applied, identifies potentials and challenges, and derives consequences for further research activities. This highlights the relevance of LCE and LCEM for research projects, especially regarding the transformation of an invention into a successful innovation.

show abstract

“…[8,9,10]) or ITO models (e.g. [17,20,21] have been used for this purpose. With a similar purpose but focused on costs, cost estimation techniques are useful.…”

Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 2: Overview Of Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 2: Overview Of Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Life cycle engineering and management methods for designing hybrid structures – cases, potentials, and challenges

Götze

Symmank

Schmidt

2020

TLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Review of Project Monitoring and Evaluation Technique as Index for Sustainable Manufacturing Performance

Ongbali,

Afolalu,

Salawu

et al. 2023

2023 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Sustainable Development Goals (SEB-SDG)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tracing Relationship between Cluster’s Performance and Transition to the Circular Economy

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clusters are defined as geographically close groups of organizations that work together to gain a competitive advantage. Clusters’ shared activities involve knowledge sharing, a common pool of resources, innovations, and cooperation. From a more advanced perspective, clusters can work in industrial symbiosis sharing resources, energy, water, and other products. Tendencies of recent research indicate the growing interest in shifting to an efficient use of resources and sustainable development through the circular economy (CE). Clusters can work as enablers of CE to achieve a competitive advantage. The purpose of this study is to trace the relationships between cluster performance and shifting to the CE indicators. Correlation analysis was used as a method to indicate the relationships between pairs of clusters’ performance and shifting to the CE indicators. The limitations of the research refer to the selection of the indicators as both concepts gain insights, although still debatable. The results show that 16 out of 25 cluster performance indicators were identified that have strong or moderate relationships among pairs while shifting to the CE indicators. These indicators are recommended to be included in observation, benchmarking, or evaluation of the clusters’ activities. They can be significant in monitoring the development of shifting to the CE or in combinations with other research areas.

show abstract

Methodology for the early analysis and evaluation of the resource efficiency of process chains for manufacturing hybrid structures

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Life cycle engineering and management methods for designing hybrid structures – cases, potentials, and challenges

Life cycle engineering and management methods for designing hybrid structures – cases, potentials, and challenges

Review of Project Monitoring and Evaluation Technique as Index for Sustainable Manufacturing Performance

Tracing Relationship between Cluster’s Performance and Transition to the Circular Economy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About