2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17764-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for the Evaluation of an International Airport Automated Border Control Processing System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the operational evaluation of the BVS focuses on aspects such as accuracy of recognition, traveler throughput, and usability, as well as analyzing how these factors influence each other [MacLeod and McLindin 2011]. However, although most aspects can be accurately evaluated in ABC systems, the accuracy evaluation faces some challenges because too few impostor attempts are present [MacLeod and McLindin 2011] and collected biometric data are not readily made public for privacy reasons.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Biometric Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the operational evaluation of the BVS focuses on aspects such as accuracy of recognition, traveler throughput, and usability, as well as analyzing how these factors influence each other [MacLeod and McLindin 2011]. However, although most aspects can be accurately evaluated in ABC systems, the accuracy evaluation faces some challenges because too few impostor attempts are present [MacLeod and McLindin 2011] and collected biometric data are not readily made public for privacy reasons.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Biometric Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the operational evaluation of the BVS focuses on aspects such as accuracy of recognition, traveler throughput, and usability, as well as analyzing how these factors influence each other [MacLeod and McLindin 2011]. However, although most aspects can be accurately evaluated in ABC systems, the accuracy evaluation faces some challenges because too few impostor attempts are present [MacLeod and McLindin 2011] and collected biometric data are not readily made public for privacy reasons. In fact, the legislation of some countries does not allow the public dissemination of biometric data (particularly regarding the fingerprint and iris traits), match scores, and decision thresholds obtained and used by the biometric systems installed for government activities [Sprokkereef 2008;Iglezakis 2013].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Biometric Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the operational evaluation of the ABC system is more complex than the procedure used in other application scenarios, and the computation of typical figures of merit, such as FAR, FRR or ROC curves is also more difficult. It is therefore necessary to rely on evaluations carried out using public datasets or with internal testing procedures [7]. An alternative is to perform the analysis using a subset of the transactions carried out by the ABC system that guarantees privacy protection [6].…”
Section: Multimodal Biometric Fusion In Abc Systems a Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The A-machine is a core component of the nowadays eborders concept [7], [9], [11] and mobile systems for large public events such as music festivals, political rallies, or sporting events. In this paper, we consider a particular case of an A-machine which supports an interviewing process as a part of authentication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%