2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology of studies evaluating death certificate accuracy were flawed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The medical record review of deaths that occurred in 2008 was conducted in accordance with the principles set out by Johanssen et al [14] to ensure the transparency and reproducibility of medical record review studies. However, this work varied from previous applications of this technique as the small population and health service arrangements meant that an independent review in-country was not possible, thus introducing an additional step of extracting data from the medical record rather than having a physician review the record directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The medical record review of deaths that occurred in 2008 was conducted in accordance with the principles set out by Johanssen et al [14] to ensure the transparency and reproducibility of medical record review studies. However, this work varied from previous applications of this technique as the small population and health service arrangements meant that an independent review in-country was not possible, thus introducing an additional step of extracting data from the medical record rather than having a physician review the record directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous medical record review studies [14-16] have started from the presumption of a reference standard, where one source (the medical record) is assumed to be more accurate than the other (the medical certificate). However, such an assumption was not valid in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is however reasonable to assume that a large proportion of deaths classified as 'illdefined' by the 3C committee are indeed classified as cardiovascular diseases in the national mortality register because conditions such as hypertension or diabetes are mentioned in death certificates. In a recent review of studies evaluating death certificate accuracy, Johansson et al [16] emphasized that identifying the underlying cause of death is a complex process. International recommendations about this process, which are applied by national mortality registers, favour the selection of causes of death that are precise and considered as meaningful for public health purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an article by Johansson et al [22], the methodologies of various studies evaluating death certificates were compared and discussed. In our study, the essential criteria for such an evaluation suggested in that study were met.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%