Methodology proposal of the creation of competency models and competency model for the position of a sales manager in an industrial organisation using the AHP method and Saaty's method of determining weights

Horváthová, Petra; Čopíková, Andrea; Mokrá, Kateřina

doi:10.1080/1331677x.2019.1653780

Cited by 12 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The choice of the AHP method, which is one of the methods used to solve the decision problem, was influenced by the fact that the criterion of a choice of penetrants can be either quantitative or qualitative, and can also be analyzed either subjectively or objectively [39][40][41], which result from modeling in the contexts of uncertainty and risk [37,42]. Furthermore, the choice of penetrant, resulting from the effectiveness of the AHP method in decision-making based on both subjective and objective assessments, can be made by an expert group [43].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…During the determination process of the quality level of the fluorescent penetrant, the proposed (by Saaty, creator of the AHP method) scale was applied, i.e., from 1 to 9, where 1 means equal importance, and 9 absolutely more important [39][40][41].…”

Section: Determination Of the Quality Level Of Penetrantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…. , k; with proportion of weights i-th and j-th criteria (1), being a square matrix of the order of n × n, where n = the number of criteria (2), and is therefore called the dominance matrix [40]:…”

Section: Determination Of Criteria Weightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In matrix S, always on the diagonal is grade 1, meaning that the criteria compared are equivalent to each other; therefore, above the diagonal are the results of the comparison of the two criteria, and below the diagonal, the inverse comparison values [40].…”

Section: Determination Of Criteria Weightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To conduct, in an effective way, the non-destructive testing (NDT) of products—in particular, the fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI)—remains a challenge. Therefore, the aim of this work is to propose the method of support in the choice of a fluorescent penetrant to be used in FPI research. In the results of the usage of the proposed procedure, it is demonstrated that it is possible to reduce the negative impacts on the environment by FPI processes (through sustainability), while including other criteria, i.e., financial, security, productive (Industry 4.0), and societal (Society 5.0) criteria. The essence of the proposed method is to integrate two methods of decision support. These were the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and the cost–quality analysis (AKJ). Using the AHP method, the quality level of fluorescent penetrant (to the satisfaction of the customer)—which included the sustainability criteria—are calculated. These criteria include natural environment, reactivity, combustibility, level of sensitivity, and type of washing (emulsification). Then, with the help of the AKJ, the most favorable penetrant—in terms of quality and cost—is calculated and, thus, indicated. This choice must include the concept of sustainable development. Therefore, this method can be used to choose fluorescent penetrants in manufacturing and service enterprises which carry out FPI.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Determination Of the Quality Level Of Penetrantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Determination Of Criteria Weightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Determination Of Criteria Weightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to the high capability of MADM methods for choosing the best alternative based on a number of criteria, some of which may be in contradiction with each other, these methods have become one of the most popular topics in the decision theory literature (Amiri et al, 2020;Barak & Dahooei, 2018;Stanujkic et al, 2015;Yazdani et al, 2019). These methods have also been used in the field of HRM on certain issues such as performance management, staff selection, and recruitment (Abdullah & Zulkifli, 2015;Balezentis et al, 2012;Beskese et al, 2018;Chou et al, 2012;Dursun & Karsak, 2010;Ensslin et al, 2013;Heidary Dahooie et al, 2018;Horv athov a et al, 2019;Kelemenis & Askounis, 2010;Mammadova & Jabrayilova, 2018;Polychroniou & Giannikos, 2009;Rahmanniyay & Yu, 2019;Sang et al, 2015;Tuana, 2018;Zhang & Liu, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A multi-attribute framework for the selection of high-performance work systems: the hybrid DEMATEL-MABAC model

Estiri

Dahooie

Vanaki

et al. 2020

Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research in strategic human resource management indicates that high performance work systems (HPWS) have a positive impact on the overall performance of an organization as a result of better human resource (HR) outcomes. Regarding the multi-dimensional and complex nature of these factors, common statistical models are not useful for examining the performance of HPWS. Using the capabilities of multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods to deal with various criteria that may be contradictory, this study proposes a MADM-based framework that provides the opportunity to prioritize HR practices. Based on this framework, high-performance HR practices and their related HR outcomes were identified after studying the theoretical literature and ascertaining the views of decision-makers and HR experts. Then, after looking at the interactions among HR outcomes, the weights of the criteria were calculated using the method of the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). Then, the alternatives were ranked using the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method. Finally, the designed framework was implemented in an organization active in the banking industry. This framework can be used to improve employees' performance and, consequently, the performance of the organization. Accordingly, taking into account the resource constraints organizations face, the priorities presented can be helpful in budgeting human-resource-management (HRM) improvement projects and making an appropriate resource allocation for this.

show abstract

A Competency Framework for Assembly Operators

Skripnik

Hoedt

Aghezzaf

et al. 2023

Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Methodology proposal of the creation of competency models and competency model for the position of a sales manager in an industrial organisation using the AHP method and Saaty's method of determining weights

Abstract: Mokrá (2019) Methodology proposal of the creation of competency models and competency model for the position of a sales manager in an industrial organisation using the AHP method and Saaty's method of determining weights,

Cited by 12 publications

References 17 publications

Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria

Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria

A multi-attribute framework for the selection of high-performance work systems: the hybrid DEMATEL-MABAC model

A Competency Framework for Assembly Operators

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About