2014
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20140722-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and Evaluations for Simulation Debriefing in Nursing Education

Abstract: Debriefing is the most important aspect of simulated learning, but actual debriefing practices are not evidence based or widely known. Expert opinions on effective simulation debriefing have been widely published and likely guide debriefing in nursing education. However, various terms are used to discuss simulation debriefing, making it difficult to distinguish debriefing methods. Also, the means for evaluating simulation debriefing are lacking. The purpose of this review is to identify and examine methods and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data suggest that evaluation of debriefing is needed. At least seven means for evaluation of debriefing are available in the literature (Waznonis, 2014) and should be used regularly to evaluate debriefing to move beyond perceived competence toward measuring the level of competence of debriefers. (14) (continued on next page) (continued on next column) Novice ¼ very limited prior experience using debriefing.…”
Section: Criterion 1: Facilitator Competencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data suggest that evaluation of debriefing is needed. At least seven means for evaluation of debriefing are available in the literature (Waznonis, 2014) and should be used regularly to evaluate debriefing to move beyond perceived competence toward measuring the level of competence of debriefers. (14) (continued on next page) (continued on next column) Novice ¼ very limited prior experience using debriefing.…”
Section: Criterion 1: Facilitator Competencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents described a semistructured process of debriefing using an eclectic approach to debriefing that may be contributing to the challenge of student engagement by limiting the debriefing to ''what went well and what would you change.'' To move toward a high level of facilitation, faculty should strongly consider consistently using one of the at least 22 specific methods of debriefing described in the literature (Waznonis, 2014). Prebriefing is an introduction to the scenario, roles, timing, equipment, and debriefing, but little is known about prebriefing and its relationship to debriefing (Page-Cutrara, 2014).…”
Section: Criterion 4: Structured Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing evidence that simulation debriefing can improve nursing students' clinical judgment (Dreifuerst, 2012;Forneris et al, 2015;Mariani et al, 2014;Tosterud et al, 2014). However, the literature reveals a lack of standardized methodological approaches for debriefing practice (Couper and Perkins, 2013;Lavoie et al, 2013) and unclear descriptions of debriefing (Waznonis, 2014). As a result, there is considerable variation in the methods to promote clinical judgment through debriefing and, accordingly, there is a need for a comprehensive understanding of the conceptual elements of debriefing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Waznonis (2014) has identified 22 methods for debriefing, we have selected five commonly cited methods and two approaches to assess debriefings (Dieckmann, Reddersen, Zieger, & Rall, 2008;Rudolph, Simon, Raemer, & Eppich, 2008;Arora, Ahmed, Paige, Nestel, & Sevdalis, 2012;Brett-Fleegler, Rudolph, Eppich, Monuteaux, & Simon, 2012;Dreifuerst, 2012;Ahmed, Arora, Russ, Darzi, & Sevdalis, 2013;Phrampus & O'Donnell, 2013). For each method, we have aligned Gibbs's reflective cycle with the six stages (Table 1).…”
Section: Gibbs's Reflective Cycle and Its Relation To Debriefing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory supporting reflection is not well studied, and there is insufficient evidence to support any single debriefing strategy providing better or best learning outcomes (Husebø, Dieckmann, Rystedt, Søreide, & Friberg, 2013;Dufrene & Young, 2014;Kihlgren, Spanager, & Dieckmann, 2014). Gibbs's reflective cycle (Gibbs, 1988) has previously been used to support the process of reflection in midwifery practice (Gnash, 2009), interprofessional patient-centered care and ethical dilemmas (Jones, 2007;Burzotta & Noble, 2011), emergency care (Powley, 2013), and nursing, physiotherapy, and dental hygiene education (Wilding, 2008;Maloney, Tai, Lo, Molloy, & Ilic, 2013;Wallace, Blinkhorn, & Blinkhorn, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%