2023
DOI: 10.1089/wound.2022.0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and Limitations of Augmenting Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Therapeutic Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This therapy could serve as an allogeneic cell therapy derived from young, healthy donors with MSCs modified ex vivo with a clinically safe vector, AAV/E-selectin, to be available as an off-the-shelf regenerative medicine product. Furthermore, the high transduction efficiency of this AAV-E-Selectin vector, preexisting clinical safety data on AAV vectors, and cost-effective scalability of AAV vectors for future clinical work make the use of this form of genetic manipulation more attractive than other vectors such as lentivirus or adenovirus and gene-editing platforms such as CRISPR/Cas9 systems 15,29 . Similar to unmodified and GFP-expressing MSCs, modifying MSCs in this manner did not appear to affect their normal functionality with regards to their proliferative ability or trilineage differentiation capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This therapy could serve as an allogeneic cell therapy derived from young, healthy donors with MSCs modified ex vivo with a clinically safe vector, AAV/E-selectin, to be available as an off-the-shelf regenerative medicine product. Furthermore, the high transduction efficiency of this AAV-E-Selectin vector, preexisting clinical safety data on AAV vectors, and cost-effective scalability of AAV vectors for future clinical work make the use of this form of genetic manipulation more attractive than other vectors such as lentivirus or adenovirus and gene-editing platforms such as CRISPR/Cas9 systems 15,29 . Similar to unmodified and GFP-expressing MSCs, modifying MSCs in this manner did not appear to affect their normal functionality with regards to their proliferative ability or trilineage differentiation capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Many genetic methods to alter MSCs can be associated with undesirable off-target effects on MSC populations by reducing their native self-renewal and differentiation properties 15,27 . We employed a clinically safe AAV vector to transfer the E-selectin gene into bone marrow–derived MSCs, which do not express E-selectin in normal conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local engraftment and survival of MSCs, especially in tissues with relative hypothermia and diminished blood supply, can be further improved through mechanical cell delivery systems and culture of aggregate 3D MSC spheroids. Combinations of these approaches may be elucidated in future studies to harness the maximum therapeutic effects of MSCs for clinical applications ( 78 ). Furthermore, future work should consider the ability of other cell-based therapies such as endothelial progenitor cells and mononuclear cells alone or in combination with MSCs for clinical revascularization strategies ( 47 ).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell transplantation therapies, including mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation, autologous cell transplantation, and direct chondrocyte transplantation, are effective modalities for treating growth plate injuries. One of the most sought-after cell types for transplantation is MSCs, which are nonhematopoietic pluripotent stem cells with the ability to self-renew and differentiate into various mesenchymal cells, including osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic lineages. , However, uncontrolled chondrogenesis and the low survival rate of MSCs after transplantation pose significant challenges to their clinical application in cartilage regeneration . The conventional view is that chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs usually requires the induction of growth factors . Notwithstanding that growth factors, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), can promote chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs, they yield significant off-target effects on the cartilage matrix and lead to hypertrophy of MSCs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The conventional view is that chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs usually requires the induction of growth factors. 11 Notwithstanding that growth factors, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), can promote chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs, they yield significant off-target effects on the cartilage matrix and lead to hypertrophy of MSCs. 12 Moreover, the guidance of MSC differentiation through cell signaling by these growth factors occurs in a dose-and timedependent manner, with unstable and uncertain outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%