2002
DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2002.11449543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and Problems in Developing and Using Instruments for Measuring the Quality of Life of the Mentally Ill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study must be examined in the context of its methodological limitations: only those patients capable of understanding the purposes and procedures of the study took part, and there are problems inherent in measuring QOL in the mentally ill (Burkovskii et al, 2002). Veenhoven (2003) argues that QOL indexes score many different things that cannot be meaningfully added, and treat external conditions and inner capabilities separately.…”
Section: Examination Of the Characteristics Of The High And Low 'Satisfaction With Life In General' Patient Groups (High Low) Table 1 Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study must be examined in the context of its methodological limitations: only those patients capable of understanding the purposes and procedures of the study took part, and there are problems inherent in measuring QOL in the mentally ill (Burkovskii et al, 2002). Veenhoven (2003) argues that QOL indexes score many different things that cannot be meaningfully added, and treat external conditions and inner capabilities separately.…”
Section: Examination Of the Characteristics Of The High And Low 'Satisfaction With Life In General' Patient Groups (High Low) Table 1 Conmentioning
confidence: 99%