2008
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and Tools for Comparative Genomics of Foodborne Pathogens

Abstract: A comparison of genome sequences and of encoded proteins with the database of existing annotated sequences is a useful approach to understand the information at the genome level. Here we demonstrate the utility of several DNA and protein sequence comparison tools to interpret the information obtained from several genome projects. Comparisons are presented between closely related strains of Escherichia coli commensal isolates, different isolates of O157:H7 and Shigella spp. It is expected that comparative genom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to pangenomics, but ORFs are chosen by screening of genomes from multiple strains of pathogenic and commensal strains of a species [18,21].…”
Section: Approach Methods Used Limitations Of Methods Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to pangenomics, but ORFs are chosen by screening of genomes from multiple strains of pathogenic and commensal strains of a species [18,21].…”
Section: Approach Methods Used Limitations Of Methods Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omic methods could help to progress in this direction. For instance, identification of pathways involved in pathogen stress adaptation patterns has been determined by comparative genome analysis in food [30]. More recently, differential gene expression analysis and genome-wide transcriptome analysis have been used to identify food-related stress resistance biomarkers [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Virulence and Hostpathogen Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three biological replicates were used for each treatment and the control. Cells were treated with RNA stabilization reagent and total RNA was isolated as described [15,16]. RNA was treated with RNasefree DNase twice (once using on-column DNase treatment as per Qiagen RNeasy protocol, and once in-solution as per New England BioLab's protocol and re-purified using Qiagen RNeasy kit.…”
Section: Rna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%