Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0022166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and tools for equivalent data model mapping construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Creating mediated schema: Most of the previous work on automatically creating mediated schemas focused on the theoretical analysis of the semantics of merging schemas and the choices that need to be made in the process [3,6,15,17,22,25]. The goal of these work was to make as many decisions automatically as possible, but where some ambiguity arises, refer to input from a designer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creating mediated schema: Most of the previous work on automatically creating mediated schemas focused on the theoretical analysis of the semantics of merging schemas and the choices that need to be made in the process [3,6,15,17,22,25]. The goal of these work was to make as many decisions automatically as possible, but where some ambiguity arises, refer to input from a designer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been quite a bit of work on automatically creating mediated schemas that focused on the theoretical analysis of the semantics of merging schemas and the choices that need to be made in the process (Batini et al, 1986;Buneman et al, 1992;Hull, 1984;Kalinichenko, 1990;Miller et al, 1993;Pottinger and Bernstein, 2002). The goal of these works was to make as many decisions automatically as possible, but where some ambiguity arises, refer to input from a designer.…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic definitions of equivalence of database states, database schemas and data models were introduced to preserve operations and information while constructing of mappings of various structured data models into the canonical one [11], [12]. According to this approach, each data model was defined by syntax and semantics of two languages -data definition language (DDL) and data manipulation language (DML).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main principle of mapping of an arbitrary source data model into the target one (the canonical model) constituted the principle of commutative data model mapping . According to it preserving of operations and information of a source data model while mapping it into the canonical one could be reached under the condition, that the diagram of DDL (schemas) mapping and diagram of DML (operators) mapping are commutative [12]. At that time in the process of data model mappings construction the denotational semantics was used as a formalism (metamodel), allowing to prove a commutativity of the diagrams mentioned [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%