2015
DOI: 10.3390/pr3030568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and Tools for Robust Optimal Control of Batch Chromatographic Separation Processes

Abstract: This contribution concerns the development of generic methods and tools for robust optimal control of high-pressure liquid chromatographic separation processes. The proposed methodology exploits a deterministic robust formulation, that employs a linearization of the uncertainty set, based on Lyapunov differential equations to generate optimal elution trajectories in the presence of uncertainty. Computational tractability is obtained by casting the robust counterpart problem in the framework of bilevel optimal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The robust optimization method in this study is similar to the methods presented in [29] [33]. The main difference is that the model responses of the introduced disturbances in this study are obtained stochastically, instead of alternatively utilizing a deterministic approach through linearization of the uncertainty set.…”
Section: Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The robust optimization method in this study is similar to the methods presented in [29] [33]. The main difference is that the model responses of the introduced disturbances in this study are obtained stochastically, instead of alternatively utilizing a deterministic approach through linearization of the uncertainty set.…”
Section: Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that a process disturbance, however slight, can cause a batch failure in terms of not meeting the purity constraint [26] [29]. In order to account for such disturbances it is necessary to formulate a robust counterpart problem, which in this study will be accomplished by introducing a back-off term to the purity inequality constraint in Equation (10e).…”
Section: T Z C T Z C T Q T Z P T Y T X Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the Simulator can simulate a ProcessModel for a fixed number of cycles, or continue simulating until the corresponding module in Figure 1 confirms that cyclic Stationarity is reached. Different criteria can be specified such as the maximum deviation of the concentration profiles or the peak areas of consecutive cycles [28]. The simulation terminates if the corresponding difference is smaller than a specified value.…”
Section: Assertion Of Cyclic Stationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We list below only a few examples over the past year (since 2015). Recent applications of WENO schemes can be found in the simulations of astrophysics and geophysics [55,83,137,140,162,172,215,223], atmospheric and climate science [70,181,225], batch chromatographic separation [101], biomolecular solvation [286], bubble clusters in fluids [222], combustion [11,15,24,164,214,268], detonation waves [92,114,145,233], elastic-plastic solids [173], flame structure [261], granular gas [3], hypersonic flows [109], infectious disease models [209], laser welding [174], magnetohydrodynamics [20,166], mathematical finance for solving the Black-Scholes equation [90], multiphase and multispecies flows [13,91,108,110,159,160,239], networks and blood flows [168], ocean waves [28,125], oil storage process [196], rarefi...…”
Section: Finite Difference and Finite Volume Weno Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%