2009
DOI: 10.1159/000224640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Assessing Familial Aggregation: Family History Measures and Confounding in the Standard Cohort, Reconstructed Cohort and Case-Control Designs

Abstract: Objectives: To test whether case-control-based familial aggregation studies produce estimates of risk to relatives that are inherently biased or confounded by age and family size, and to compare case-control-derived estimates with those from the reconstructed cohort method. In addition, we test if the definition of family history affects the accuracy of results obtained from either design. We use simulated data, which allows us to know the true data origin. Methods: We simulated populations of three generation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two complementary approaches were used to examine the association between familial aggregation of cancer and risk of pediatric/adolescent HL. 25,26 The first approach was a traditional case-control analysis, wherein we used conditional logistic regression to model the association between a positive family cancer history, overall and for specific relative and/or cancer subgroups, and HL in the index child, overall and by tumor EBV status (EBV1 or EBV2); odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate risk. In addition to accounting for matching fac-tors, we adjusted for maternal education level (<high school (HS) graduate, HS graduate or >HS) to control for confounding due to differences in SES levels between cases and controls, and for number of first-and second-degree relatives, respectively, to minimize confounding by family size/ structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two complementary approaches were used to examine the association between familial aggregation of cancer and risk of pediatric/adolescent HL. 25,26 The first approach was a traditional case-control analysis, wherein we used conditional logistic regression to model the association between a positive family cancer history, overall and for specific relative and/or cancer subgroups, and HL in the index child, overall and by tumor EBV status (EBV1 or EBV2); odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate risk. In addition to accounting for matching fac-tors, we adjusted for maternal education level (<high school (HS) graduate, HS graduate or >HS) to control for confounding due to differences in SES levels between cases and controls, and for number of first-and second-degree relatives, respectively, to minimize confounding by family size/ structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two complementary approaches were used to examine the association between familial aggregation of cancer and risk of pediatric/adolescent HL . The first approach was a traditional case–control analysis, wherein we used conditional logistic regression to model the association between a positive family cancer history, overall and for specific relative and/or cancer subgroups, and HL in the index child, overall and by tumor EBV status (EBV+ or EBV−); odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Moreover, this study was the first to use a reconstructed cohort design and obtain data directly from relatives and spouses 8 , thereby reducing misclassification and enhancing power. 7,14,15 In summary, this study provides evidence of strong familial aggregation of insomnia. The main implication of these findings is that future studies should evaluate the impact of early prevention or intervention programs in preventing the development of insomnia among at-risk individuals.…”
Section: Limitations Strengths and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The risk of insomnia in relatives can then be estimated and compared between exposed and unexposed cohorts of relatives. 13 This design is deemed advantageous, as it yields unbiased risk estimates of a disease 14,15 and allows for the identification and assessment of disease risk factors (e.g., age of onset) in relatives and probands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, no significant differences were observed between the two groups with regard to the degree of astigmatism in a study by Cagigrigoriu et al 11. On the other hand, case–control studies are associated with some degrees of bias 2728. Furthermore, a detailed discussion is presented on how to determine the proband when there is more than one proband in each group by Matthews et al 29.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%