2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for assigning confidence to toxicity data with multiple values — Identifying experimental outliers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…toxicity is increasing linearly with lipophilicity. 5,[22][23][24]43 Consideration of the QSARs developed in this study shows an improvement in the models when utilising CS-weighted regression. The improvement is both the statistical fit but also the slope for log K OW which approaches one when employing CS-weighting, i.e.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Predictivity Of The Qsars/qsprsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…toxicity is increasing linearly with lipophilicity. 5,[22][23][24]43 Consideration of the QSARs developed in this study shows an improvement in the models when utilising CS-weighted regression. The improvement is both the statistical fit but also the slope for log K OW which approaches one when employing CS-weighting, i.e.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Predictivity Of The Qsars/qsprsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The negative logarithm of the effective concentration causing 50% light reduction (EC 50 ) is expressed as the pT. 20 Extending the original compilation of Kaiser and Palabrica 20 , Steinmetz et al 5 collected a large meta-dataset with 1813 different values for Microtox toxicity. In order to create meaningful QSAR models in aquatic toxicology, there is an application of the well-established relationship between acute toxicity and hydrophobicity for compounds acting by the non-polar narcosis mechanism of action.…”
Section: Aquatic Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The higher the experimental error within a data set, then the subsequent QSA(P)R model will be poorer based on the RMSE in prediction for a representative external test set [86,87]. For a QSA(P)R model to have a RMSE in prediction for a representative external test set of B0.30 then the experimental error associated with a data set needs to be B0.20 [86].…”
Section: [P] + [D]mentioning
confidence: 99%