2014
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Constructing and Assessing Propensity Scores

Abstract: Propensity scores are one useful tool for accounting for observed differences between treated and comparison groups. Careful testing of propensity scores is required before using them to estimate treatment effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
550
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 712 publications
(564 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
550
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach-recommended when using weighted complex survey data-non-treated individuals are weighted by their distance in propensity score from treated individuals within a bandwidth (0.06) of the propensity score. [33][34][35] After matching, covariate balance (as indicated by standardized mean differences of G10 %) was achieved ( Supplementary Figures 1 and 2). Finally, we ran a surveyweighted, design-based logistic regression model within each matched sample to estimate adolescents' log odds of psychological distress as a function of their perceived or objectively-measured neighborhood violence and associated propensity score, to account for residual confounding.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach-recommended when using weighted complex survey data-non-treated individuals are weighted by their distance in propensity score from treated individuals within a bandwidth (0.06) of the propensity score. [33][34][35] After matching, covariate balance (as indicated by standardized mean differences of G10 %) was achieved ( Supplementary Figures 1 and 2). Finally, we ran a surveyweighted, design-based logistic regression model within each matched sample to estimate adolescents' log odds of psychological distress as a function of their perceived or objectively-measured neighborhood violence and associated propensity score, to account for residual confounding.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue of selection and to better understand the direct effects of IHVPE on families with parents who would have never been married, I use two approaches. First, I use inverse treatment propensity score weights to create balanced pre-IHVPE and post-IHVPE samples within the unmarried group following procedures described in Imbens (2004) and Garrido et al (2014). Second, I perform a bounding exercise following Lee (2009).…”
Section: Effects On Father Involvement and Child Well-being In Fammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of these patients are described in Table I. The balance of co-variables and small standardized differences (<0.25) were good for all co-variables (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%