2014
DOI: 10.1071/eg14013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for determining remanent and total magnetisations of magnetic sources – a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4c. These results confirm numerically what was pointed out by Clark (2014): confocal ellipsoids with properly scaled isotropic susceptibilities, no remanence and the same magnetic moment produce different magnetic fields at the same external points, unless the inducing field happens to lie along one of their axes. Farrar (1979) …”
Section: Confocal Ellipsoidssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4c. These results confirm numerically what was pointed out by Clark (2014): confocal ellipsoids with properly scaled isotropic susceptibilities, no remanence and the same magnetic moment produce different magnetic fields at the same external points, unless the inducing field happens to lie along one of their axes. Farrar (1979) …”
Section: Confocal Ellipsoidssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This ambiguity between confocal ellipsoids with the same magnetic moment has already been pointed out by Clark (2014). It occurs for the particular case in which the uniform inducing field is parallel to an ellipsoid axis and there is no remanence.…”
Section: Ambiguity Between Confocal Ellipsoids With the Same Magneticmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second inversion was performed using Geosoft's magnetic vector inversion (Ellis et al, 2012) algorithm, however the resultant model was spatially near-identical to the susceptibility model, which leads to the interpretation that the magnetic geological bodies have no measurable magnetic remanence. The susceptibilities are approaching values (>0.005SI) where self demagnetisation may occur (Clark, 2014) but these effects were ignored in this study.…”
Section: Geophysical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If significant remanence is present in the target it is necessary to take into account the direction and intensity of the remanence when performing magnetic modelling, or inversions. Methods exist that allow the total magnetisation of isolated magnetic sources to be estimated (see Clark, 2014) and such methods should also be used when siting drill targets. These calculations and the measurement techniques discussed here are complementary and both should be used when remanent effects have been identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%