2016
DOI: 10.1149/07515.0079ecst
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Determining the Working Electrode Interfacial Area for Electroanalytical Measurements of Metal Ions in Molten LiCl-KCl

Abstract: In this paper, we present an empirical evaluation of methods for determining the interfacial area between a working electrode and molten salt—specifically demonstrated using the eutectic LiCl-KCl system. Approaches studied include dipping a cold electrode into the molten salt, using a vertical translator to adjust the height of the electrode, partially coating the electrodes with an insulating material, and integrating a pre-peak which may represent formation of a monolayer of metal on the electrode. Salt mixt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been demonstrated to be accurate within 0.5 mm for molten salts. 41 In our experiments the working electrode was typically immersed 2-3 cm, resulting in a calculated surface area error of less than 2%. Visual observation of the experiments confirmed no salt wicking up the electrodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This method has been demonstrated to be accurate within 0.5 mm for molten salts. 41 In our experiments the working electrode was typically immersed 2-3 cm, resulting in a calculated surface area error of less than 2%. Visual observation of the experiments confirmed no salt wicking up the electrodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three general approaches have been taken in the literature for measuring the surface area: physical measurement, differential height and fixed area. [92][93][94][95] The physical measurement method uses observed salt lengths adhering to the WE and known dimensions of the WE (i.e., diameter) to determine the WE surface area. It is important to account for the effects of surface tension when using this method.…”
Section: Other Methods and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to account for the effects of surface tension when using this method. 92 This is best done by immersing the WE into the salt and allowing enough time for the WE to be wetted by the salt and equilibrate thermally. Simply dipping, then immediately removing the electrode can introduce significant errors (∼20%).…”
Section: Other Methods and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solution resistance between the working electrode (WE) and reference electrode (RE) was measured via an electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) method using a Gamry Reference 600+ potentiostat, and all CV was performed with an Autolab PGSTAT302N potentiostat. A vertical translator featuring a Velmex X-slide was used to precisely control the depth of the working electrode for an accurate estimate of surface area, as described elsewhere [15]. The WE surface area for the measurements varied from 0.5 to 1 cm 2 .…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%