1970
DOI: 10.5558/tfc46402-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Ensuring Additivity of Biomass Components by Regression Analysis

Abstract: In many forestry problems additive regression equations are expected because of the nature of the data. This paper discusses the reasons why one does or does not have these additive equations. Mathematical proofs of the theory are given, with a numerical example.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The best prediction models were chosen on the basis of the following statistical criteria: goodness of fit (characterised by four statistics: R 2 , bias, residual mean square and most importantly, the Furnival index) and the absence of multicollinearity, as indicated by the condition number. In the second stage, selected equations for each biomass component were fitted simultaneously in order to ensure compatibility between the estimates of total biomass and each of their fractions [25,37], that is, the estimates of the different components should have the property of additivity. The regression methodology proposed by Zellner [54] known as weighted SUR (Seemingly Unrelated Regression), was then applied using the SAS statistical package [44].…”
Section: Tree Biomass Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best prediction models were chosen on the basis of the following statistical criteria: goodness of fit (characterised by four statistics: R 2 , bias, residual mean square and most importantly, the Furnival index) and the absence of multicollinearity, as indicated by the condition number. In the second stage, selected equations for each biomass component were fitted simultaneously in order to ensure compatibility between the estimates of total biomass and each of their fractions [25,37], that is, the estimates of the different components should have the property of additivity. The regression methodology proposed by Zellner [54] known as weighted SUR (Seemingly Unrelated Regression), was then applied using the SAS statistical package [44].…”
Section: Tree Biomass Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los modelos se ajustaron empleando el paquete estadístico SAS/STAT ® (SAS Institute Inc. 2009). En un segundo paso se realizó un ajuste simultáneo para garantizar la aditividad (Kozak 1970, Parresol 1999, en el cual no se incluyó la ecuación de biomasa de hojas debido a que había menor número de observaciones para este componente. Debido a la presencia de heterocedasticidad el ajuste se realizó con la metodología GMM (generalized method of moments), con lo cual se obtuvieron estimaciones eficientes de los parámetros (Greene 2000, SAS Institute Inc. 2009).…”
Section: Métodosunclassified
“…Studies by Kozak (1970), Chiyenda and Kozak (1984) and Briggs (1984, 1985) resulted in three different methods for forcing additivity in a lineal system of biomass equations. Parresol (1999) concluded that the most flexible and general is the method based on simultaneous adjustment using Zellner's (1962) seemingly unrelated regression (SUR).…”
Section: Simultaneous Adjustment To Ensure Additivitymentioning
confidence: 99%