2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for evaluating the impact of vertical programs on health systems: protocol for a study on the impact of the global polio eradication initiative on strengthening routine immunization and primary health care

Abstract: BackgroundThe impact of vertical programs on health systems is a much-debated topic, and more evidence on this complex relationship is needed. This article describes a research protocol developed to assess the relationship between the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, routine immunization, and primary health care in multiple settings.Methods/DesignThis protocol was designed as a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods, making use of comparative ethnographies. The study evaluates the imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Informed consent was obtained from all participants. A detailed description of our methods is available in an open-access article [ 20 ], and the full qualitative protocol is accessible online (available at: ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informed consent was obtained from all participants. A detailed description of our methods is available in an open-access article [ 20 ], and the full qualitative protocol is accessible online (available at: ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research described here, conducted in early 2012 with a brief follow-up in 2015, was part of a larger study examining the impact of polio eradication activities on health systems in a variety of contexts (Closser et al, 2012(Closser et al, , 2014. The study protocol was approved by the Middlebury College Institutional Review Board.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe in more detail elsewhere some challenges we faced in practice as well as modifications necessitated by security and other considerations (Closser et al. ). We relied on three major methods to collect data: document review, participant observation, and interviews.…”
Section: Methodology: Systematic Comparative Ethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%