2018
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201814505008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for evaluation of mechanical stress condition of materials

Abstract: Abstract. Primary attention is given to the following methods: method by drilling cylindrical holes (drill method) and integrated ultrasonic method using volume (longitudinal and transverse), surface, and sub-surface waves. Drill method allows determination of residual mechanical stress in small depth of material surfaces, assessing type, size, and orientation of principal stresses. For the first time, parallel studies are carried out of mechanical stress in materials using the electroacoustic effect of volume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the traditional methods for pipeline axial stress inspection include the small hole method [5], the X-ray diffraction method [6], and the ultrasonic stress detection method [7]. However, the small hole method can cause damage to pipelines and is not suitable for stress detection of in-service pipelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the traditional methods for pipeline axial stress inspection include the small hole method [5], the X-ray diffraction method [6], and the ultrasonic stress detection method [7]. However, the small hole method can cause damage to pipelines and is not suitable for stress detection of in-service pipelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure of the connecting element under load can lead to human casualties. In the best case, a breakdown of the connecting element destroys the structure, and long-term repair of the structure leads to high economic costs, both due to the need to replace damaged parts of the structure (capital costs), and indirectly due to equipment downtime [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%