Integrated Groundwater Management 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Exploring Uncertainty in Groundwater Management Predictions

Abstract: Models of groundwater systems help to integrate knowledge about the natural and human system covering different spatial and temporal scales, often from multiple disciplines, in order to address a range of issues of concern to various stakeholders. A model is simply a tool to express what we think we know. Uncertainty, due to lack of knowledge or natural variability, means that there are always alternative models that may need to be considered. This chapter provides an overview of uncertainty in models and in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, there has been growing attention to the development of frameworks for considering uncertainty in a more holistic manner (e.g. Beven, 2016;Guillaume et al, 2016;Maier et al, 2016). These efforts have contributed to improving our conceptual understanding of uncertainty by focusing on:…”
Section: Nature Of the Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been growing attention to the development of frameworks for considering uncertainty in a more holistic manner (e.g. Beven, 2016;Guillaume et al, 2016;Maier et al, 2016). These efforts have contributed to improving our conceptual understanding of uncertainty by focusing on:…”
Section: Nature Of the Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many ways to assess and describe uncertainty in the predictions (Guzman et al 2015); the best representation will depend on the context in which the IWRM problem operates, and the requirements and understanding of the stakeholders (Hunt 2017). In IWRM, where cost-benefit trade-offs are often assessed, a more quantitative approach to characterizing uncertainty can be valuable (Guillaume et al 2016). Most straightforward is a simple reporting of model predictions under a few specific conditions (e.g., streamflow depletion, land use practices, water allocations or environmental flow releases under drought and wet conditions).…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increasing complexity of models leaves researchers with the thorny task of communicating uncertain results in a way that provides usable insights to policy makers and to the public. Guillaume et al (2016) provides valuable guidance by covering various aspects: the model setup ("modelers and stakeholders need to work together to define a problem, in a manner cognizant of the uncertainty involved", pg. 716); the need for wide participation and for iteration; the methods to generate alternative model realizations; advice on the representation of uncertain outcomes, namely on choosing different levels of detail, from single outcomes (for example, averages), to distributions, to bounds (best and worst cases), to scenarios, to spelling out points of ignorance; and finally, communication, reminding us that "a groundwater scientist cannot expect that those needing to use the estimates will understand the academic terms and metrics.…”
Section: What If We Are Not Sure? the Impact Of Uncertainty In Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%