2022
DOI: 10.3390/pr10020184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Financial Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects: A Review

Abstract: The financial evaluation of renewable energy sources (RES) projects is well explored in the literature, but many different methods have been followed by different authors. Then, it is important to understand if and how these methods have been changing and what factors may have driven new approaches. Therefore, this article aims to explore the publications on the financial evaluation of RES projects from 2011 to 2020 and to present a critical analysis of the reviewed literature. The methods for evaluating RES p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research is exploratory and forward-looking, exploring the financial impacts of climate change, on cash flows. The construction and evaluation of financial cash flows is a well-known, widely used and researched concept in financial analysis (Delapedra-Silva, et al, 2022), (Desai, 2019), (Damodaran, 2012). It is qualitative in that it requires expert opinion and it is quantitative in that we perform basic Excel-based calculations of a company's cash flow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research is exploratory and forward-looking, exploring the financial impacts of climate change, on cash flows. The construction and evaluation of financial cash flows is a well-known, widely used and researched concept in financial analysis (Delapedra-Silva, et al, 2022), (Desai, 2019), (Damodaran, 2012). It is qualitative in that it requires expert opinion and it is quantitative in that we perform basic Excel-based calculations of a company's cash flow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Delapedra-Silva et al (2022), the literature on the financial evaluation of renewable energy sources (RES) projects has extensively explored various methods, but there have been changes over time, driven by different factors. This article aims to analyze publications on the financial evaluation of RES projects from 2011 to 2020 and provide a critical analysis of the literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it must be taken into account that these projects face financial challenges that are associated with their characteristics and that, according to Santos et al [14], influence the choice of the best method to evaluate them financially: (i) they are carried out in competitive markets; (ii) they demand investments of significant amounts; (iii) with high irreversibility levels; and (iv) they are exposed to multiple factors of uncertainty, so the associated investment decisions deserve to be analyzed holistically to compare projects, support investment decisions, and, thus, achieve a sustainable, viable and profitable energy future [15]. Hence, studying and developing valuation methods for these projects is essential to encourage these investment initiatives, not only due to the technical advances anticipated in these technologies but also because their assessment must consider the multiplicity of variables that influence their viability [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods that have been used to financially evaluate investment projects range from the traditional one, based on the construction of deterministic cash flows and the calculation of financial indicators such as the net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return of the project (IRR), payback period (PR), return on investment (ROI), and, for energy projects, levelized cost of energy (LCOE) [14,16], to more advanced methods such as that of Real Options (ROs), Games Theory (GT), and Option Games (OGs), which allow us to overcome the limitations of the traditional one (it does not consider uncertainty and the effect of interactions among competitors) on the value of investment initiatives [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%