Genetics and Genomics of the Triticeae 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77489-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Genetic Analysis in the Triticeae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QTL analysis was performed with MultiQTL software package (http://www.multiqtl.com) using the general interval mapping (IM) procedure. Single-QTL and two-linked-QTL models were used for detection of genetic linkage for each trait in each environment, separately (Korol et al , 2009). Multi-environment analysis (MEA) was conducted by joint analysis of trait values scored in three environments (WL05, WW05 and WW07).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QTL analysis was performed with MultiQTL software package (http://www.multiqtl.com) using the general interval mapping (IM) procedure. Single-QTL and two-linked-QTL models were used for detection of genetic linkage for each trait in each environment, separately (Korol et al , 2009). Multi-environment analysis (MEA) was conducted by joint analysis of trait values scored in three environments (WL05, WW05 and WW07).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), we developed two different algorithms for the second phase, i.e., searching for the consensus solution to MCGM. The first one was named Full Frame (FF), which uses special heuristics for global discrete optimization of synchronized-TSP for all markers (unique, shared conflicting, and shared nonconflicting) [16,18]. Our numerous simulation tests show that the FF algorithm is effective up to k=10-15 populations (data sets) with a total number of shared markers N<50.…”
Section: B Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2) Building consensus maps by re-analyzing the initial (raw) data: This approach is based on searching the best multilocus order corresponding to minimum sum of map lengths among all possible non-conflicting orders, i.e., testing only those orders that fit the condition that shared markers must be in shared order for any subgroup of mapping populations [16]. With this approach, consensus mapping is reduced to a specific version of TSP that can be referred to as synchronized TSP [17]).…”
Section: Two Approaches In Consensus Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, with very large numbers of markers available for a mapping population, most of the markers will remain inseparable by recombination and will represent groups of co-segregating, or absolutely linked markers (AL markers). In such cases, only one marker from each group could be placed on the map that can be referred to as a framework, skeleton, or bin map; the remaining markers can then be attached to the skeleton map (Mester et al 2003 ;Korol et al 2009 ;Ronin et al 2010 ). The real situation is signifi cantly complicated by genotyping errors, which "diversify" a certain part of markers that would be identical in the ideal situation of no errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%