2018
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2017.2785442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Improved Discrimination Between Ventricular Fibrillation and Tachycardia

Abstract: Differentiating between ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in clinical and preclinical research is based on subjective definitions that have yet to be validated using objective criteria. This is partly due to shortcomings in the discrimination ability of current objective approaches, typified by the algorithms that perform cardiac rhythm classification using low-dimensional feature representations of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. These identify ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but do not disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the proposed approach has achieved an AC of 81.25% for the classi cation of VT and VF classes using 8second ECG frames with a 10-fold cross-veri cation. Alwan et al (2017) classi ed VT and VF using the leakage characteristics of the VF lter and spectral parameters. A set of high-dimensional functions preserves more up-to-date information about the ECG dataset and provides an AC of detection of 73.5% using a support vector classi er.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the proposed approach has achieved an AC of 81.25% for the classi cation of VT and VF classes using 8second ECG frames with a 10-fold cross-veri cation. Alwan et al (2017) classi ed VT and VF using the leakage characteristics of the VF lter and spectral parameters. A set of high-dimensional functions preserves more up-to-date information about the ECG dataset and provides an AC of detection of 73.5% using a support vector classi er.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EKG feature extraction has been approached in the time [16], [17], frequency [18], [19], time-frequency [15], [20], [21], and complexity domains [22], [23]. The machine learning approaches explored in the classification stage include K-nearest neighbors [15], [24], support vector machines [10], [25], [26], artificial neural networks [13], [19], [27], and ensembles of decision trees [11], [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%