1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1989.tb00304.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Improving Standardized Test Scores: Fruitful, Fruitless, or Fraudulent?

Abstract: You may be able to identify several ways students can be prepared to take an upcoming test, but which ways are ethical to use? There are available materials that you may purchase and use to prepare students for a test: Are they effective and is it ethical to use them? What constitutes an ethically acceptable test preparation procedure?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
73
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparing students for tests in isolation of content delivery jeopardizes overall instruction and learning (Mehrens and Kaminski, 1989). With increased pressure to produce higher test scores, teachers are placed in a position of considering inappropriate means to meet the demands of external forces.…”
Section: Instructional Strategies Teachers Use To Preparementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preparing students for tests in isolation of content delivery jeopardizes overall instruction and learning (Mehrens and Kaminski, 1989). With increased pressure to produce higher test scores, teachers are placed in a position of considering inappropriate means to meet the demands of external forces.…”
Section: Instructional Strategies Teachers Use To Preparementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching directly to the same form or a previous form of the test are considered unacceptable and unethical (Popham, 1991;Mehrens and Kaminski, 1989;Kilian, 1992).…”
Section: Instructional Strategies Teachers Use To Preparementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testwiseness consists primarily of providing students with tools needed to navigate through the wording, structure, physical requirements, and expectations of external tests (Phillips, 1983;Hall, 1990;Palmer, 1984;Ducote, 1982;Ligon, 1981;Seton, 1992). The tools (strategies) most commonly provided the student include looking for clues, familiarity with format, process of elimination, time planning, physical and emotional preparedness, direction following, knowing the type of item, grammatical relationship between the stem and the answer, carefulness, and knowing the type of item that is being presented (Summers, 1983;Montgomery County Board of Education, 1982;Phillips, 1983;Ligon, 1981;Anderson, 1981;Diamond, 1972;BangertDrowns, 1983;Guifford, 1980;Kilian, 1992;George, 1985;Mehrens and Kaminski, 1989). The number of strategies mentioned exceeds twenty-five.…”
Section: Test Preparation Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These materials exist in various forms from paper-and-pencil to computer-interactive preparation. Mehrens and Kaminski (1989) (Ducote, 1982).…”
Section: Test Preparation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation