2008
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/19/8/085202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for in-field user calibration of an inertial measurement unit without external equipment

Abstract: This paper presents methods to calibrate and compensate for non-zero biases, non-unit scale factors, axis misalignments and cross-axis sensitivities of both the tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscopic setups in a micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) based inertial measurement unit (IMU). These methods depend on the Earth's gravity as a stable physical calibration standard. Specifically, the calibration of gyroscopes is significantly improved by comparing the outputs of the accelerometer and the IMU orientati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
148
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, deterministic errors (e.g. axes misalignment) are compensated through physical models during calibration procedures and will not be treated in this article; see [1,2] for more details. On the other hand, stochastic errors contain components which have random behavior (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, deterministic errors (e.g. axes misalignment) are compensated through physical models during calibration procedures and will not be treated in this article; see [1,2] for more details. On the other hand, stochastic errors contain components which have random behavior (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models for correcting the measurements of an accelerometer system have been formed in works of Skog and Händel (2006), Fong, Ong, and Nee (2008), Frosio, Pedersini, and Borghese (2009). In our present work, a mathematical calibration model (successfully tested in accelerometer sensors by Frosio, Pedersini, and Borghese 2009) has been adopted.…”
Section: Methodology For Evaluation Of Low-cost Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the literature shows that these mechanisms can work with constant accuracy and reliability, provided that they will undergo calibration procedures involving high precision instruments (VectorNav 2016). In later reports, researches are directed to calibration methodologies that do not rely on laboratory equipment (Fong, Ong, and Nee 2008;Frosio, Pedersini, and Borghese 2009;Skog and Händel 2006). The only way to ensure the sensors system efficiency, in achieving the required accuracy, is to perform an evaluation precision control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth-sensing camera enables the tablet to capture a point cloud (PC), or a set of 3D points, that represents objects within its field of view. [23][24][25] The phantom was placed in the treatment position within the room and scanned with the tablet. The scan was complete by capturing frames from the depth camera while rotating tablet approximately 300…”
Section: A 3d Model Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%