1967
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(67)90032-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for the determination of intermediary enzymes in mixed cultures used for the purification of organic polluted waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same activities were then measured after settling the sludge for 4 hours in a vessel excluding air or oxygen. The enzymes were extracted from a 50 ml sample according to the method of Kotze (10), by centrifugation at 35.000 g for 30 minutes at 4°C and sonication using a soniprobe type 20-200 S (Bioblock Instruments) operated at output setting 0-200 W. The sludge sample volume of 20 ml was contained in an icewater cooled vessel, and optimal sonication time was preliminarily determined in a range from 30 seconds to 15 minutes. (16,17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same activities were then measured after settling the sludge for 4 hours in a vessel excluding air or oxygen. The enzymes were extracted from a 50 ml sample according to the method of Kotze (10), by centrifugation at 35.000 g for 30 minutes at 4°C and sonication using a soniprobe type 20-200 S (Bioblock Instruments) operated at output setting 0-200 W. The sludge sample volume of 20 ml was contained in an icewater cooled vessel, and optimal sonication time was preliminarily determined in a range from 30 seconds to 15 minutes. (16,17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time in the United States, the major objective of secondary treatment processes was to remove the gross organic pollutants (measured by BOD and TSS), so that the appropriate sludge activity measures were those that reflected the overall activities of the aerobic heterotrophs in the culture. Thus, they included parameters such as specific oxygen uptake rate (milligrams oxygen per gram VSS per hour); organic matter removal rate (food-to-microorganism ratio [F/M], grams COD per gram VSS per day); dehydrogenase activity (milligrams triphenylformazan per gram VSS per day); and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration (micrograms ATP per gram VSS) (Bucksteeg and Theile, 1959;Ford et al, 1966;Kotze, 1967). Weddle and Jenkins (1971) found that steady-state values of oxygen uptake rate (OUR), dehydrogenase activity, and ATP content all increased with activated sludge growth rate (decreased with SRT), if expressed on a VSS basis (i.e., activity per gram VSS per hour), but were fairly constant with activated sludge growth rate, if expressed on a viable cell basis (i.e., activity per gram viable cells per hour).…”
Section: Collective Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were stored in an ice bath and were used within 30 min after their preparation. With the following exceptions, the enzymes were assayed as outlined by Kotze (1967): glucokinase was determined as described for hexokinase. The assays for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, lactate dehydrogenase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase, and glutamate dehydrogenase were run with both nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) as coenzymes.…”
Section: Preparation Of Cell-fuee Enzyme Extractsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction was started with 3.0 pmol fructose. The volumes were made up to 3.3 ml and the further details of the assays were as described by Kotze (1967).…”
Section: Preparation Of Cell-fuee Enzyme Extractsmentioning
confidence: 99%