1948
DOI: 10.1007/bf02986826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for the study of histocompatibility genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
132
0
10

Year Published

1955
1955
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
132
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These 'laws' were formulated by George Snell in 1948 (20). However, these were not really laws, but rather experimental observations made by C. C. Little (and others) between 1909 and 1924.…”
Section: Solving the Genetics Of Transplant Immunologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These 'laws' were formulated by George Snell in 1948 (20). However, these were not really laws, but rather experimental observations made by C. C. Little (and others) between 1909 and 1924.…”
Section: Solving the Genetics Of Transplant Immunologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the next 10 years Snell introduced the term 'histocompatibility loci' (tissue compatibility) to describe the multiple 'factors' that Little had realized were responsible for tissue rejection (20). Snell devised a breeding strategy (based on Little's original insight) that enabled him to isolate individual histocompatibility loci by generating 'isogenic resistant' strains (by repeatedly identifying members of F2 generations that were resistant to death by tumor transplantation) (20).…”
Section: Histocompatibility Loci and The Mhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MHC was genetically defined more precisely by Snell (1948), who first used the term. It has been recognized as a large multigene family present in all jawed vertebrates (Danchin et al, 2004;Kelley et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the limitations imposed by linkage in QTL definition, congenic strains (Snell, 1948) have been utilized. The distinct value of rat congenic strains is firstly (Deng, 1998) the negligible genetic differences among individuals: they are more than 99.9% identical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%