2014
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-0646c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for the Year 6 Follow-Up Study of Children in the Infant Feeding Practices Study II

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:We describe methods used in the Year 6 Follow-Up (Y6FU) of children who participated in the Infant Feeding Practices Study II (IFPSII). This study consists of a questionnaire administered 6 years after the IFPSII to characterize the health, development, and diet quality of the children. METHODS:The Y6FU sample was a subset of those who participated in IFPSII. The IFPSII participants were drawn from a national consumer opinion panel; neither the IFPSII nor the Y6FU sample is nationally representative.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our sample includes a large cohort followed longitudinally, it was not nationally representative; mother-child pairs in this study were less likely to be nonwhite or low SES than mother-child pairs in the general US birth cohort from the same time period. 24 Nonetheless, our study design was internally valid, and the associations were adjusted for numerous sociodemographic differences. Moreover, we conducted a thorough stratified analysis before developing regression models and did not observe differential effects in any of the sociodemographic subgroup strata (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our sample includes a large cohort followed longitudinally, it was not nationally representative; mother-child pairs in this study were less likely to be nonwhite or low SES than mother-child pairs in the general US birth cohort from the same time period. 24 Nonetheless, our study design was internally valid, and the associations were adjusted for numerous sociodemographic differences. Moreover, we conducted a thorough stratified analysis before developing regression models and did not observe differential effects in any of the sociodemographic subgroup strata (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About half (48%) of the children who participated in the original survey were lost to follow-up at 6 years of age. 22 For this analysis, we excluded 16 children because they were .13 months old when they participated in the last survey of IFPS II, 6 children who had missing data on the outcome variable (SSB intake at 6 years of age), and 158 children who did not have any original SSB data (ie, had no SSB intake information) in 1 to 6 months' or 7 to 12 months' surveys, resulting in a final analytic sample of 1333 children. The IFPS II and Y6FU studies were approved by the Food and Drug Administration Institutional Review Board.…”
Section: Study Population and Survey Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 The IFPS II followed mothers and infants from late pregnancy through 1 year postpartum to understand infant feeding patterns, infants' health, factors that may affect infant feeding, and mothers' health and diet. Data were collected from May 2005 through June 2007 by using a nationally distributed consumer opinion panel.…”
Section: Study Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All questionnaires and procedures were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration' s institutional review board and the US Office of Management and Budget. Detailed information on the Y6FU is available in the methods article by Fein et al 19 in this supplement.…”
Section: Study Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%