2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3760-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of assessing and recording bladder sensation: a review of the literature

Abstract: In some of the studies, the samples were too small to draw any significant conclusions. There were also conflicting data on which tool was the most accurate, especially as each method of evaluating bladder sensation may influence the way it is described by participants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bladder sensation is subjective, and the perception of bladder sensation is influenced by many intrinsic and extrinsic factors [ 15 ]. Examination of perineal sensation and anal tone is operator dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bladder sensation is subjective, and the perception of bladder sensation is influenced by many intrinsic and extrinsic factors [ 15 ]. Examination of perineal sensation and anal tone is operator dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVR ≥ 200 ml is a sign of incomplete bladder emptying not CESR and is consistent with retention of executive control of the bladder. An ideal PVR is 0 ml, but in young adults, < 50 ml is normal; a PVR of up to 100 ml can be normal in older adults; > 200 ml is incomplete bladder emptying [ 15 ]. Anecdotally, we were aware of patients with PVRs of ≤ 200 ml who had a large compressive disc prolapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 During instillations, UIC was defined as an obvious change in detrusor pressure (≥15 cmH 2 O), and BS was conceptualized as the awareness of bladder filling and increasing sensation up to a desire to void, which numerically equals the first sensation volume (<100 ml, sensitive; 100–200 ml, good; and >200 ml, reduced). 13 14 BOOI 15 was calculated as PdetQmax−2×Qmax, and patients were divided into mild (<20), moderate (20–40), and severe (>40) BOOI groups. URA was calculated as ([1+4dQ 2 ×PdetQmax] 1/2 –1)/(2dQmax 2 ), wherein d=3.8×10 −4 , and patients were divided into ≥28.9884 cmH 2 O and <28.9884 cmH 2 O groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%