2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12571-019-00980-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of crop yield measurement on multi-cropped plots: Examples from Tanzania

Abstract: Precise agricultural statistics are necessary to track productivity and design sound agricultural policies. Yet, in settings where multi-cropping is prevalent, even crop yield-perhaps the most common productivity metric-can be challenging to measure. In a survey of the literature on crop yield in low-income settings, we find that scholars specify how they estimate the area denominator used to measure yield in under 10% of cases. Using household survey data from Tanzania, we consider four alternative methods of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Abay et al (2019) find that correcting for misestimation in either the yield ratio's numerator or denominator (only) can intensify bias in the yield measure, while ignoring mismeasurement in both variables is preferable. It should also be noted that, because yields are constructed as pure stand equivalents, this may affect our results if some seed categories are more likely to be intercropped than others (Wineman et al, 2019). A robustness check is provided in section 5 that focuses only on monocropped maize plots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Abay et al (2019) find that correcting for misestimation in either the yield ratio's numerator or denominator (only) can intensify bias in the yield measure, while ignoring mismeasurement in both variables is preferable. It should also be noted that, because yields are constructed as pure stand equivalents, this may affect our results if some seed categories are more likely to be intercropped than others (Wineman et al, 2019). A robustness check is provided in section 5 that focuses only on monocropped maize plots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutrient yield per ha for each crop was then averaged to obtain the nutrient yield per ha for PD and PI crops. This approach is similar to studies that convert yield to nutrient per ha to understand a crop’s nutrient yield and contribution 39 , 40 . For example, Cassidy et al 40 used this approach to get the average yield per ha for multi-cropped plots by converting the yield to nutrient per ha in Tanzania.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bene ts of mixed cropping (which also includes intercropping) are dependent on the speci c intercropping arrangement and include risk reduction to climate variation or disease, labour constraints, maximal utilization of limited space etc. (Wineman et al 2019). Mixed cropping may take on different spatial and/ or temporal arrangements, for example: one crop may occupy space within the plot that would otherwise be occupied by another; one crop may be added between rows of another crop which has been planted at its normal density; or two crops may share a plot for only a brief part of the growing season or occupy it at entirely different times of the year (Casley and Kumar 1989;Diskin 1997).…”
Section: Mixed Croppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed cropping may take on different spatial and/ or temporal arrangements, for example: one crop may occupy space within the plot that would otherwise be occupied by another; one crop may be added between rows of another crop which has been planted at its normal density; or two crops may share a plot for only a brief part of the growing season or occupy it at entirely different times of the year (Casley and Kumar 1989;Diskin 1997). In some cases, a particular crop is planted in more than one type of cropping system, for example pure stand and mixed cropped or multiple mixed cropping patterns (Murphy et al 1991;Wineman et al 2019).…”
Section: Mixed Croppingmentioning
confidence: 99%