2015
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of defining hypertension in electronic medical records: validation against national survey data

Abstract: A B S T R AC TBackground Electronic medical records (EMR) can be a cost-effective source for hypertension surveillance. However, diagnosis of hypertension in EMR is commonly under-coded and warrants the needs to review blood pressure and antihypertensive drugs for hypertension case identification. MethodsWe included all the patients actively registered in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database, UK, on 31 December 2011. Three case definitions using diagnosis code, antihypertensive drug prescriptions and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic medical records (EMR) contain rich clinical information, in which more than 50% of patients have at least 2 blood pressure measurements [ 12 ]. EMR also provides a population-based sample with the ability to follow patients for long periods of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic medical records (EMR) contain rich clinical information, in which more than 50% of patients have at least 2 blood pressure measurements [ 12 ]. EMR also provides a population-based sample with the ability to follow patients for long periods of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] The incomplete information on blood pressure values in the electronic healthcare records in our study was consistent with other reports. [21][22][23][24] All four countries included in this study have guidelines recommending regular blood pressure measurements for chronic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. 9,10,22,25 The Netherlands, 26 the UK 27 and Spain, 28 but not Finland, use monitoring of risk factors such as BP as indicators to monitor the quality of care for chronic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature search of the terms “THIN” and “validation” revealed that the THIN database has been validated for the Read codes for some but not all of the covariates used in this study. 16 , 25 29 It is important to note that the GOLD guidelines were updated while the manuscript was in progress. Although GOLD guidance, such as GOLD 2011/2013, may have been contemporary to treatment practices during the study period, we additionally assessed patients according to GOLD 2017 grouping, in order to demonstrate how physicians may need to adapt their treatment practices in light of new evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%