1982
DOI: 10.1002/mawe.19820130407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of determining Stress‐Strain Curves by upsetting cylindrical test‐pieces

Abstract: The upsetting test is mainly used for determining stress‐strain curves in the range of high strains. Three modifications of the upsetting test are described: upsetting conventional lubricated specimens, upsetting Rastegaev specimens with end recesses, and upsetting under sticking friction conditions. Each of these procedures offers special advantages. For example, in the Rastegaev test, the specimen remains cylindrical up to a high strain while the work required for friction cannot be neglected. By upsetting u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exemplary results of the flow curve determination for two electrical steels are shown below. To evaluate the hot forming behaviour, isothermal bulk hot compression tests [ 31 ] were performed on a servo-hydraulic hot deformation simulator at constant strain rates of 0.1 s −1 , 1 s −1 and 10 s −1 in the temperature range of 800 °C to 1100 °C ( Figure 4 a–c). In the course of these experiments, bulk samples with an initial diameter of 10 mm and an initial height of 18 mm were placed in an upsetting cup and heated in an air circulation furnace up to 1200 °C.…”
Section: Best Practice For Standard Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exemplary results of the flow curve determination for two electrical steels are shown below. To evaluate the hot forming behaviour, isothermal bulk hot compression tests [ 31 ] were performed on a servo-hydraulic hot deformation simulator at constant strain rates of 0.1 s −1 , 1 s −1 and 10 s −1 in the temperature range of 800 °C to 1100 °C ( Figure 4 a–c). In the course of these experiments, bulk samples with an initial diameter of 10 mm and an initial height of 18 mm were placed in an upsetting cup and heated in an air circulation furnace up to 1200 °C.…”
Section: Best Practice For Standard Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By holding for 10 min at 1200 °C, a homogeneous temperature distribution and similar grain size was assured in all tested samples before the compression tests at the respective deformation temperatures were conducted. Figure 4 a–c show representative hot flow curves of Fe2.4wt.%Si and Fe3.2wt.%Si ( Table 2 ) after data correction to eliminate the influence of friction and heat that occurs during deformation, as described in [ 31 ].…”
Section: Best Practice For Standard Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%