2019
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/315/2/022105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of developing a competitive strategy of the agricultural enterprise

Abstract: This article examines the features of the use of various strategies, as the basis for creating a competitive advantage of an agribusiness with stable positions both for entry and for keeping a high level during various financial changes in a market economy. Developed or selected strategy should be based on a comprehensive analysis of the business with strengths and weaknesses. The distinction between the strengths and weaknesses of a business, and accordingly the grouping of its features into advantages and di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SAS were evaluated using economic profit as an indicator of their value as an alternative investment (whether the system is able to remunerate opportunity or implicit costs) [36] and through the farm net added value, which is an indicator of their capacity to remunerate fixed factors (work, land and capital) [30]. Moreover, we complemented the systems valuation with a cost analysis for a product competitiveness estimation (whether products could have a price low enough to be competitive in the markets) [37]. The degree of commoditization was also used as an indicator of farm autonomy [35].…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysis and Level Of Commoditizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAS were evaluated using economic profit as an indicator of their value as an alternative investment (whether the system is able to remunerate opportunity or implicit costs) [36] and through the farm net added value, which is an indicator of their capacity to remunerate fixed factors (work, land and capital) [30]. Moreover, we complemented the systems valuation with a cost analysis for a product competitiveness estimation (whether products could have a price low enough to be competitive in the markets) [37]. The degree of commoditization was also used as an indicator of farm autonomy [35].…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysis and Level Of Commoditizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the views of Tynchenko, et al [6], the assessment of the chosen strategy is based on the analysis of the enterprise's external environment and internal capabilities (SWOT analysis). In addition, the chosen competitive strategy should be evaluated for compliance with corporate goals [6]. Orekhova [7], also used SWOT analysis to assess the level of development of the financial strategy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding goes against the results evidenced, reaching the conclusion when analyzing methods of developing competitive strategy in agribusiness, that there are many strategies for this, however, they will necessarily go through differentiation and cost reduction, always focused on market requirements. This implies, not only producing commodities, but understanding the added value that the customer wants (Tynchenko et al, 2019).…”
Section: Costs As a Competitive Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%