Eleventh International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2018) 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2522792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of machine-readable zone recognition results post-processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem statement for language-dependent recognition results correction based on a combination of hypotheses (encoded in the text field recognition result   (I)) language model  and an error model which defines possible modifications, is presented in [96] using WFSTs (Weighted Finite-State Transducers). An alternative approach that is based on representing  as a validation grammar with a custom predicate is described in [97,98].…”
Section: D) Collecting the Document Recognition Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem statement for language-dependent recognition results correction based on a combination of hypotheses (encoded in the text field recognition result   (I)) language model  and an error model which defines possible modifications, is presented in [96] using WFSTs (Weighted Finite-State Transducers). An alternative approach that is based on representing  as a validation grammar with a custom predicate is described in [97,98].…”
Section: D) Collecting the Document Recognition Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the recognition we use a lightweight segmentation and recognition neural network [19] [20] without any special training and setup for price tags fonts. Post-processing is called to normalize recognized value to known price tag format [21].…”
Section: Control Flowchartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Chernyshova et al 2019) explored optical font recognition for forgery detection in passport MRZs. (Petrova and Bulatov 2019) discuss methods for correcting or post-processing passport MRZ recognition results. (Hartl, Arth, and Schmalstieg 2015) present an algorithm for reading MRZ images on mobile devices, achieving an MRZ detection rate of 88.18% with 5 frames and 56.1% with single frame, along with a character reading rate of 98.58%.…”
Section: Passport Mrz Detection and Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%