1977
DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(77)90040-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of measuring the performance of ultrasonic pulse-echo diagnostic equipment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance evaluation of an ultrasonic diagnostic equipment is done on differnt levels of test equipment [1,2]. For the measurements, which are to be described here, we used a specialized signal generator.…”
Section: Literaturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance evaluation of an ultrasonic diagnostic equipment is done on differnt levels of test equipment [1,2]. For the measurements, which are to be described here, we used a specialized signal generator.…”
Section: Literaturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods and recommendations on how to carry out performance tests and quality control on ultrasound systems 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. The transducer is a vital part of the system and handled daily.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density, sound speed, and nonlinearity coefficient should be representative of human soft tissues. To determine spatial resolution, particularly lateral resolution, it was recommended to use a spherical tungsten carbide test object, which could be mounted on rods or wires in water [19]. This was written for A-mode, but could be duplicated in B-mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper restriction on the allowable ball size for the apparent target to be acoustically small was established to be d < 1.22λ F 2 , where d , λ, and F are target diameter, acoustic wavelength, and transducer f-number, respectively [19]. A lower bound of d >5 [mm/µs]/ f was placed on target size to minimize strong variations in the frequency dependence of target reflectivity for tungsten carbide in water [20], where f is the working frequency in megahertz and d is given in millimeters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%