2013
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-16202013000200016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of performance evaluation for the supervised classification of satellite imagery in determining land cover classes

Abstract: . 2013. Methods of performance evaluation for the supervised classification of satellite imagery in determining land cover classes. Cien. Inv. Agr. 40(2): 419-428. Satellite imagery, in combination with remote sensing techniques, provides a new opportunity for monitoring and assessing crops with lower cost and greater objectivity than traditional surveys. The present research employed Landsat 5/TM satellite imagery to identify the land cover classes in Cafelândia (Paraná, Brasil), a predominantly agricultural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Afterward, we collected samples by visual interpretation of these images. We applied the supervised classifier Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) over the stack of these selected images (Souza et al, 2013). We extracted the mask of water/no water, along with the elevation and azimuth solar angles information from the metadata, and we used it as input to the ATSA algorithm.…”
Section: Automatic Time-series Analysis (Atsa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, we collected samples by visual interpretation of these images. We applied the supervised classifier Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) over the stack of these selected images (Souza et al, 2013). We extracted the mask of water/no water, along with the elevation and azimuth solar angles information from the metadata, and we used it as input to the ATSA algorithm.…”
Section: Automatic Time-series Analysis (Atsa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more visited each land cover, the better. Then the data were analyzed with the Kappa coefficient to determine the percentage of accuracy and improvement step (de Souza et al 2013). The use of spectral colors and field checks confirmed more accurately than land cover in Landsat imagery.…”
Section: Land Cover Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, available parametric algorithms were carried out in ERDAS IMAGINE software to classify the images into three categories: forests, residential areas and other features. For this purpose, maximum likelihood (Patil1 et al, 2012), fully-fuzzy supervised (Zhang & Foody, 2001), minimum distance (Yang et al, 2015) and Mahalonobis classifications (Souza et al, 2013) were run in ERDAS IMAGINE (www.erdas.com). The validation of classified images was based on the collected GCPs data through the sampling of different references: aerial photos from 1972 and 1987, digital topographic maps for 2000 and field observation samples and Google Earth images of 2010.…”
Section: Forests and Residential Areas Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%