Methods of quantifying change in multiple risk factor interventions

Abstract

Objective-Risky behaviors such as smoking, alcohol abuse, physical inactivity, and poor diet are detrimental to health, costly, and often co-occur. Greater efforts are being targeted at changing multiple risk behaviors to more comprehensively address the health needs of individuals and populations. With increased interest in multiple risk factor interventions, the field will need ways to conceptualize the issue of overall behavior change.Method-Analyzing data from over 8,000 participants in four multibehavioral interventions, we present five different methods for quantifying and reporting changes in multiple risk behaviors.Results-The methods are: (a) the traditional approach of reporting changes in individual risk behaviors; (b) creating a combined statistical index of overall behavior change, standardizing scores across behaviors on different metrics; (c) using a behavioral index; (d) calculating an overall impact factor; and (e) using overarching outcome measures such as quality of life, related biometrics, or cost outcomes. We discuss the methods' interpretations, strengths, and limitations.Conclusion-Given the lack of consensus in the field on how to examine change in multiple risk behaviors, we recommend researchers employ and compare multiple methods in their publications. A dialogue is needed to work towards developing a consensus for optimal ways of conceptualizing and reporting changes in multibehavioral interventions.

A systematic review of single health behavior change interventions vs. multiple health behavior change interventions among older adults

“…To our knowledge, this is the first review to attempt to compare SHBC interventions to MHBC interventions among older adults. The idea of identifying which type of intervention (SHBC vs. MHBC) is most effective among older adult populations has been alluded to in several studies [9,22,25]. Our preliminary findings show that there were substantially more (>4 times) positive SHBC intervention behavior changes than MHBC interventions behavior changes identified, while the number of negative SHBC interventions behavior changes was higher than the number of negative MHBC interventions (2:1 ratio).…”

Advances in multiple health behavior change research

“…Although many different methods of quantifying change in multiple risk behaviors have been proposed [15], these methods have only infrequently been compared. Two articles in the Special Section focus on the challenge of assessing multiple behavior change.…”

Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI’s with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion

“…Future reports will include analyses of outcomes over longer-term follow-ups. These reports will include outcomes based on recent advances in assessing impact for multiple behavior change (Prochaska, Judith et al, 2007). Such impact analyses take into account recruitment, participation and efficacy rates summed across all treated behaviors.…”