Methods of Rapid Evaluation, Assessment, and Appraisal

Abstract

A central issue in the use of rapid evaluation and assessment methods (REAM) is achieving a balance between speed and trustworthiness. In this article, the authors review the key differences and common features of this family of methods and present a case example that illustrates how evaluators can use rapid evaluation techniques in their own work. In doing so, the authors hope to (a) introduce readers to a family of techniques with which they may be unfamiliar, (b) highlight their strengths and limitations, and (c) suggest appropriate contexts for use. Ultimately, the authors hope that REAM becomes a valuable addition to evaluators' toolkits.

Failing to Meet the Good Parent Ideal: Self-Stigma in Parents of Children with Mental Health Disorders

“…To avoid the difficulties that can be experienced during qualitative analysis due to the copious and often unwieldy data produced through verbatim transcription (Halcomb and Davidson 2006;McNall and Foster-Fishman 2007), a leaner transcript was scribed during each interview and subsequently analysed (e.g., Corrigan et al 2015). To do so, a scribe (a third person within the interview, who acted independently to the interviewer and did not participate in the interview) documented salient quotes, repetitive themes and contextual, emotional, non-verbal and any other salient detail likely to influence the interpretation of meaning.…”

Contribuindo com a institucionalização da avaliação em saúde: uma proposta de auto-avaliação

“…Um dos princípios centrais do REM é que os módulos de avaliação não são simplesmente utilizados seqüencialmente, mas sim interativamente e cada um combinado ao outro 3 .…”

“…Esses métodos podem ser modificados, adequando-se a qualquer serviço ou comunidade. Os quatro princípios do REM são: rapidez, uso de múltiplas fontes, pragmatismo e custo-efetividade 2,3,14,15 .…”

“…Esta teve, também, como um de seus objetivos desenvolver uma matriz de auto-avaliação, com a utilização do método rápido de avaliação (REM), de maneira que o gestor pudesse medir a implantação do "monitoramento e avaliação" no próprio estado 2,3 . A matriz de auto-avaliação atenderia à oportunidade do estudo e, também, à utilidade, pois se constitui em uma abordagem de baixo custo e de fácil aplicabilidade para o ní-vel local 3 .…”

Maximize Impact, Minimize Resources: Locating Food Deserts and Increasing SNAP Spending on Fruits and Vegetables

“…Other common names for rapid assessment techniques include rapid epidemiological assessments and rapid assessment procedures (Manderson & Aaby, 1992). McNall and Foster-Fishman (2007) review commonalities and differences between rapid evaluation and assessment techniques and offer suggestions for facilitating rapid assessments that are both feasible and credible, which we have tried to apply in this case study. Among their recommendations is establishing clear objectives for the rapid assessment so that appropriate data are collected from appropriate sources and the process is not slowed by altering which data are needed and from whom.…”