2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods Of Sample Size Calculation In Retrospective Burden Of Illness Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 persons conducted interviews. The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula (17), referring to the prevalence of knowledge of at least 3 ODS of 45.9%, with 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error reported by a study conducted in Ethiopia (17) .…”
Section: Study Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 persons conducted interviews. The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula (17), referring to the prevalence of knowledge of at least 3 ODS of 45.9%, with 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error reported by a study conducted in Ethiopia (17) .…”
Section: Study Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study sample size was computed using the approach for unit costs proposed by Johnston et al Assuming a 95% confidence level and a standard deviation of 25% of the average cost estimate, 24 facilities were estimated as sufficient to give an estimate with a precision of ± 10%. 13 A standardised, stratified random sampling strategy shared across the countries participating in the Value-TB project was used to select the health facilities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size calculations was demonstrated for burden of illness by characterizing precision around estimates of mean , using the following formula [9]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%