Methods of Securing Centric Relation and Other Positional Relation Records in Complete Denture Prosthesis

Schlosser, R.O.

doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1941.0025

Cited by 13 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…El registro más antiguo de RC es el intraoral directo, en 1756, Phillip Pfaft, dentista de Federico el Grande de Alemania, fue el primero en describir la técnica "Taking a Bite" (tomar una mordida) y hasta finales del siglo XIX fue la técnica más usada (2).…”

Section: Registros Estáticos O Posicionalesunclassified

Relación céntrica: revisión de conceptos y técnicas para su registro. Parte II

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relación céntrica: revisión de conceptos y técnicas para su registro. Parte II. AVANCES EN ODONTOESTOMATOLOGÍA/ 369 RESUMEN La relación céntrica ha sido objeto de disparidad de criterios en la odontología durante más de un siglo. A lo largo de este trabajo, vamos a exponer diferentes métodos usados tanto para obtener el registro, como para comprobar su certeza y corroborar la posición condilar. Dado que no existe evidencia científica en el tema, en este trabajo, revisaremos los estudios experimentales que aparecen en la literatura. Los hemos divididos en dos partes, la primera relacionada con la definición de relación céntrica y la segunda parte relacionada con técnicas de registro, posición condilar y la discrepancia entre relación céntrica y oclusión céntrica.

show abstract

Section: Registros Estáticos O Posicionalesunclassified

Relación céntrica: revisión de conceptos y técnicas para su registro. Parte II

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tanto en el plano mesiodistal como en el vertical a nivel de cada caja condilea como en la platina incisiva, se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre las tres variables de registro (p<0,001). A nivel de las platinas incisivas tanto BYC como BYR proporcionaron registros más retrusivos que IM [medias aritméticas (desviaciones estándar) en milímetros: 3,82 (2,1º) y 4,53 (2,18), respectivamente). Los obtenidos con BYR fueron significativamente más retrusivos que en el grupo BYC [media aritmética (desviación estándar) en milímetros: 1,41 (1,00)].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Demand for this type of treatment is expected to increase due to socioeconomic and demographic circumstances 1 , and there is currently a need to provide this kind of treatment to a growing universe of people. Occlusion has always been one of the key aspects in these treatments [2][3][4][5][6][7] . In the 21 st century, the International Academy of Prosthodontics 8 glossary of prosthodontic terms (GPT-8) recognizes seven meanings for the term Centric Relation, thereby indicating the range of concepts applied to occlusion, jaw relations and their records.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Centric relation registration with intraoral central bearing on curved vs. flat plates with rim trays in edentulous patients

Aredes

Fassina

Macchi

2021

Acta Odontol Latinoam

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare jaw relation record in the completely edentulous patient using acrylic rim trays with curved or flat registration plates or using the manual guidance technique. The study included 17 patients – 11 female and 6 male, average age 70 years. Three jaw relation records were taken during one session, in the same vertical dimension, using acrylic rim trays: (1) with manual guidance (IM), (2) with self-guided recording system with acrylic rim tray and central support using a curved plate (BYC) and (3) with self-guided recording system with acrylic rim tray and central support using a flat plate (BYR). The models were mounted on a Whip Mix 2240 articulator to which a condyle position device (Orthodent) was added to register, at the level of the condyle box and incisal table, the differences among the positions recorded with the different setups (IM, BYC and BYR). The distances were measured on millimeter paper provided by the recording system manufacturer. For statistical analysis, confidence intervals (95%) were calculated for the mean differences and Student’s t-test for paired data (significance level: alpha<0.05). On both the mesiodistal plane and the vertical plane at the level of each condyle box and the incisal table, there were statistically significant differences among the three systems (p<0.001). At the level of incisal table, BYC and BYR provided more retrusive records than IM [arithmetic means (standard deviations) in millimeters: 3.82 (2.10) and 4.53 (2.18), respectively). The records obtained with BYR were significantly more retrusive with BYC [arithmetic mean (standard deviation) in millimeters: 1.41 (1.00)]. We reject the null hypothesis that proposes that all three registration systems described are clinically equivalent for establishing a jaw relation record in completely edentulous patients.

show abstract

A practical approach to extensive restorative dentistry

Brecker¹

1954

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Methods of Securing Centric Relation and Other Positional Relation Records in Complete Denture Prosthesis

Cited by 13 publications

References 2 publications

Relación céntrica: revisión de conceptos y técnicas para su registro. Parte II

Relación céntrica: revisión de conceptos y técnicas para su registro. Parte II

Centric relation registration with intraoral central bearing on curved vs. flat plates with rim trays in edentulous patients

A practical approach to extensive restorative dentistry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About