2018 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/scsp.2018.8402666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of traffic surveys in cities for comparison of traffic control systems — A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, it is advisable to place the cameras with license plate detection as close as possible to the communication. It is worthwhile to use a design feature leading to an improvement of the reading cone as far as possible into the longitudinal axis of the communication, which can improve the image quality and, thus, the reliability of correct license plate recognition [26][27][28][29][30]. Vehicles that were not recognized in normal traffic were usually influenced by some specific feature (e.g., a very dirty license plate, a tractor with a cart with a license plate in a non-standard location, a different license plate format), only in units of cases the standard license plate was not recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it is advisable to place the cameras with license plate detection as close as possible to the communication. It is worthwhile to use a design feature leading to an improvement of the reading cone as far as possible into the longitudinal axis of the communication, which can improve the image quality and, thus, the reliability of correct license plate recognition [26][27][28][29][30]. Vehicles that were not recognized in normal traffic were usually influenced by some specific feature (e.g., a very dirty license plate, a tractor with a cart with a license plate in a non-standard location, a different license plate format), only in units of cases the standard license plate was not recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%