2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1390-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods to Assess the Reproducibility and Similarity of Hi-C Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MAE, SSIM and PSNR are defined by the following equations: where Ŷ denotes the predicted correlation matrices and Y represents the real correlation matrices. Furthermore, considering the chromatin compartmentalization information of the correlation matrices, we evaluated their reproducibility using multiple Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) and GenomeDISCO score [52].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAE, SSIM and PSNR are defined by the following equations: where Ŷ denotes the predicted correlation matrices and Y represents the real correlation matrices. Furthermore, considering the chromatin compartmentalization information of the correlation matrices, we evaluated their reproducibility using multiple Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) and GenomeDISCO score [52].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying the similarity between Hi-C contact matrices is essential for understanding how the 3D genome organization differs among various cell lines or under different biological conditions. Although the scarcity of the data and the intricate nature of artifacts (7, 8) render this task difficult, the recognition of inherent geometric shapes and patterns has been facilitated by the representation of contact matrices as images and networks (9). Similar images will share geometric layouts of local self-similarity (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying the similarity between Hi-C and micro-C contact matrices is essential for understanding how the 3D genome organization differs among various cell lines or under different biological conditions. However, the scarcity of the data and presence of intricate artifacts ( 7 , 8 ) render this task difficult. Traditional statistics such as the Pearson correlation coefficient are not well suited for comparing contact matrices, as they often scores biological replicate contact matrices similarly to unrelated samples ( 8 , 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%