Methods Used to Evaluate Pain Behaviors in Rodents

Abstract

Rodents are commonly used to study the pathophysiological mechanisms of pain as studies in humans may be difficult to perform and ethically limited. As pain cannot be directly measured in rodents, many methods that quantify “pain-like” behaviors or nociception have been developed. These behavioral methods can be divided into stimulus-evoked or non-stimulus evoked (spontaneous) nociception, based on whether or not application of an external stimulus is used to elicit a withdrawal response. Stimulus-evoked methods, which include manual and electronic von Frey, Randall-Selitto and the Hargreaves test, were the first to be developed and continue to be in widespread use. However, concerns over the clinical translatability of stimulus-evoked nociception in recent years has led to the development and increasing implementation of non-stimulus evoked methods, such as grimace scales, burrowing, weight bearing and gait analysis. This review article provides an overview, as well as discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the most commonly used behavioral methods of stimulus-evoked and non-stimulus-evoked nociception used in rodents.

Interleukin‐4 Gene Transfection and Spheroid Formation Potentiate Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteoarthritis

“…One hour before testing, rats were transported to the experimental room to minimize environmental stress. Animals were then placed on a metal mesh floor and acclimatized to this environment for 15 min before testing . The filaments were applied to the mid plantar surface of the hind paw through the mesh floor.…”

“…Animals were then placed on a metal mesh floor and acclimatized to this environment for 15 min before testing. [65] The filaments were applied to the mid plantar surface of the hind paw through the mesh floor. Probing was only performed when the animal's paw was in contact with the floor.…”

Searching for analgesic drug candidates alleviating oxaliplatin‐induced cold hypersensitivity in mice

“…Indeed, our experience with these cold sensitivity‐assessing assays indicates that in contrast to the hot plate test, in the cold plate test, animal behavior that reflects the occurrence of pain in response to oxaliplatin administration might be much more diverse and usually has more subtle manifestations (Video S1). Of note, it was previously suggested that in thermal methods data quality is improved if the time to onset of a particular pain behavior, rather than specific behavior types, is recorded (Deuis et al., ), so in our research latency to pain reaction is the parameter measured.…”

“…As a consequence, the first latencies measured may be longer than the subsequent ones, which is frequently observed in unmanipulated, poorly manipulated, or non‐habituated mice (Barrot, ). Thirdly, learning abilities of mice might be responsible for the observed shortening of latency to pain reaction during subsequent exposures to the cold plate test (Deuis et al., ). Hence, this test might be less reliable for repeated measurements.…”

Physical Activity Induces Nucleus Accumbens Genes Expression Changes Preventing Chronic Pain Susceptibility Promoted by High-Fat Diet and Sedentary Behavior in Mice

“…The delta mechanical nociceptive threshold was obtained through electronic von-Frey (vF) apparatus 25 (Insight, Riberão Preto, Brazil) adapted for mice (Deuis et al, 2017;Martinov et al, 2013). Briefly, 26 the vF test was performed in a quiet, temperature-controlled room (21 ±1°C) and always at the same 27 time of day (1 PM ± 1 hour, light cycle).…”