2022
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58020167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methotrexate and Cetuximab—Biological Impact on Non-Tumorigenic Models: In Vitro and In Ovo Assessments

Abstract: Background Objectives: The neoplastic process remains a major health problem facing humanity. Although there are currently different therapeutic options, they raise a multitude of shortcomings related to the toxic effects associated with their administration. Methotrexate (Met) and Cetuximab (Cet) are two basic chemotherapeutics used in cancer practice, but notwithstanding despite many years of use, the mechanisms by which the multitude of side-effects occur are not yet fully understood. Thus, the present stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stereomicroscope was used to observe the vascular effects (Discovery 8 Stereomicroscope from Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and images were taken with an Axio CAM 105 color camera from Zeiss 5 min before and after application of the samples. To quantify the irritant effect at the vascular level, the analytical method of calculating the irritation score (IS) was applied using the formula described above [ 19 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stereomicroscope was used to observe the vascular effects (Discovery 8 Stereomicroscope from Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and images were taken with an Axio CAM 105 color camera from Zeiss 5 min before and after application of the samples. To quantify the irritant effect at the vascular level, the analytical method of calculating the irritation score (IS) was applied using the formula described above [ 19 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) assay, the potential in ovo toxicity of the samples was evaluated. This experiment was conducted according to the protocol described above, involving the following steps: 1) on the 10th day of incubation, at the vascular plexus of the chorioallantoic membrane, RUT-O and RUT-L, at a concentration of 100 µM along with a positive control (sodium dodecyl sulphate, 1%) and a negative control -distilled water, were applied; 2) a volume of 600 μl of each sample was added in order to ensure the complete coverage of the chorioallantoic membrane; 3) the following changes in the blood vessels were noted through a 5 minutes monitorization: hemorrhage (H), lysis (L) and coagulation (C); 4) for each sample, the time of the vascular changes was noted, then irritation was calculated according to the formula (Batista-Duharte et al, 2016;Kis et al, 2022).…”
Section: In Ovo Irritant Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wound widths were measured at the end of the treatment with CellSense Dimension 1.17 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The quantification of the effects in terms of cell migration was performed by calculating the wound healing rates (%) according to a formula used in our previous work [23,24].…”
Section: Wound Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%